Bhavishya Purana: Prediction of Muhammad : Debunking Islamic Polemicists Dr.Zakir Naik and Mushafiq Sultan

Bhavishya Purana: Prediction of Muhammad : Debunking Islamic Polemicists Dr.Zakir Naik and Mushafiq Sultan

This article is in response to one written by Famous Islamic apologetic as well as renowned Polemicist Mr.Mushafiq Sultan, who wrote one page regarding the prophecy of Muhammad in Bhavishya Purana. He distorts the facts in such a way in order to make it advantageous for Islam and its Prophet Muhammad in particular, that the meanings of actual verses become completely different and false. The true meanings of verses are mentioned in www.bhavishyapuran.blogspot.in. Here on this blogspot page , one hindu brother analyses and refutes the claim of Zakir Naik regarding Muhammad Prophesy. It was in response to that blogspot page, Mulla Mushafiq created another article that you can read here on www.bhavishyapuran.wordpress.com.

Let examine the verses and find out the truth. I am making a genuine effort to analyse the verses by each one and on the end part of this article I am going to explain why Mulla Mushafiq’s interpretations and translations are wrong and it is only his aspirational and wishful thinking.

Bhavishya Purana Prati sarga parva

“एतस्मिन्नन्तरे म्लेच्छ आचार्येण समन्वित:l महामद इति ख्यात : शिष्यशाखा समन्वित :ll 5

नृपश्चैव महादेवं मरुस्थलनिवासिनं l गंगाजलैश्च संस्नाप्य पंचगव्यसमन्वितै :ll

चंदनादिभिरभ्यर्च्य तुष्टाव मनसा हरम् ll६

भोजराज उवाच

नमस्ते गिरिजानाथ मरुस्थलनिवासिने l त्रिपुरासुरनाशाय बहुमाया प्रवर्तिने ll७

म्लेच्छैर्गुप्ताय शुद्धाय सच्चिदानन्दरूपिणे l त्वं मां हि किंकरम् विद्धि शरणार्थमुपागतम् ll८

सूत उवाच

इति श्रुत्वा स्तवं देव : शब्दमाह नृपाय तम् l गन्तव्यं भोजराजेन महाकालेश्वरस्थले ll ९

म्लेच्छैर्सुदूषिता भूमिर्वाहिका नाम विश्रुता l आर्यधर्मो हि नैवात्र वाहिके देशादारुणे ll १०

बभूवात्र महामायी यो असौ दग्धो मया पुरा l त्रिपुरो बलिदैत्येन प्रेषित: पुनरागत: ll ११

अयोनि: स वरो मत्त: प्रप्तवान्दैत्यवर्द्धन: l महामद इति ख्यात: पैशाचकृतितत्पर:ll १२

नागंतव्यम् त्वया भूप पैशाचे देशधूर्तके l मत्प्रसादेन भूपाल तव शुद्धि: प्रजायतेll १३

इति श्रुत्वा नृपश्चैव स्वदेशान्पुनरागमत् l महामदश्च तै: सार्द्धम् सिंधुतीरमुपाययौ ll १४

उवाच भूपतिं प्रेम्णा मायामदविशारद:l तव देवो महाराज मम दासत्वमागत :ll १५

ममोच्छिष्टम् स भुन्जीयाद्यथा तत् पश्य भो नृप l इति श्रुत्वा तथा दृष्ट्वा परं विस्मयमागत: ll१६

म्लेच्छ धर्मे मतिश्चासीत्तस्य भूपस्य दारुणे ll १७

तच्छ्रुत्वा कालिदासस्तु रूषा प्राह महमदम् l माया ते निर्मिता धूर्त नृपमोहन हेतवे ll१८

हनिष्यामि दुराचारम् वाहिकं पुरुषाधमं l इत्युक्त्वा स द्विज : श्रीमान्नवार्णजपतत्पर : ll१९

जप्त्वा दशसहस्रम् च तादृशाम्शम् जुहाव स: l भस्म भूत्वा स मायावी म्लेच्छदेवत्वमागत:ll२०

भयभीतास्तु तच्छिष्या: देशं वाहीकमाययु:l गृहित्वा स्वगुरोर्भस्म मदहीनत्वमागतम् ll२१

स्थापितं तैश्च भूमध्ये तत्रोषुर्मदतत्परा:l मदहीनं पुरं जातं तेषां तीर्थं समं स्मृतं ll२२

रात्रौ स देवरूपश्च बहुमायाविशारद: l पैशाचम् देहामास्थाय भोजराजम् हि सो अब्रवीत् ll २३

आर्यधर्मो हि ते राजन् सर्वधर्मोत्तम : स्मृत: l ईशाज्ञया करिष्यामि पैशाचं धर्मदारुणम् ll २४

लिङ्गच्छेदी शिखाहीन : श्मश्रुधारी स दूषक : l उच्चालापी सर्वभक्षी भविष्यति जनो मम ll २५

विना कौलं च पशवस्तेषां भक्ष्या मता मम l मुसलेनैव संस्कार : कुशैरिव भविष्यति ll २६

तस्मान्मुसलवंतो हि जातयो धर्मदूषका : l इति पैशाचधर्मश्च भविष्यति मया कृत:ll२७

Preamble to the incident

Shri Suta Gosvami said: In the dynasty of king Shalivahana, there were ten kings who went to the heavenly planets after ruling for over 500 years. Then gradually the morality declined on the earth. At that time Bhojaraja was the tenth of the kings on the earth. When he saw that the moral law of conduct was declining he went to conquer all the directions of his country with ten-thousand soldiers commanded by Kalidasa. He crossed the river Sindhu and conquered over the gandharas, mlecchas, shakas, kasmiris, naravas and sathas. He punished them and collected a large amount of wealth.

The meanings of the above shlokas

Shlokas 5 & 6 are as follows:

“एतस्मिन्नन्तरे म्लेच्छ आचार्येण समन्वित:l महामद इति ख्यात : शिष्यशाखा समन्वित :ll

नृपश्चैव महादेवं मरुस्थलनिवासिनं l गंगाजलैश्च संस्नाप्य पंचगव्यसमन्वितै :ll५

चंदनादिभिरभ्यर्च्य तुष्टाव मनसा हरम् ll६

True meaning

Then the king went along with Mahamada (Muhammad), the preceptor of mleccha-dharma, and his followers to the great god, Lord Shiva, situated in the desert. He bathed Lord Shiva with Ganges water and worshipped him in his mind with pancagavya (milk, ghee, yoghurt, cow dung, and cow urine) and sandalwood paste, etc. After he offered some prayers and pleased him.

MULLA MUSHAFIQ Says

The first thing one has to understand about the relevant passage of Bhavishya Purana, is that it is a dream or a vision and not an actual reality because no meeting of any Raja Bhoj happened with Prophet Muhammad, nor does history record any such interaction. Dreams always have to be interpreted and not taken too literally. The figures in the dreams have deep meaning which needs to be revealed. This is the only plausible way to interpret this chapter. I will highlight the main figures of this dream/vision and what they symbolize. They are as follows:

1. Mahamad: Stands for Prophet Muhammad, as well as Islam.

2. Raja Bhoj: Symbolizes the dominant innocent Hindu population of India

3. Kalidaas: Symbolizes the shrewd Brahmins and Swamis of India

4: Angelic being: Symbolizes God or at times his envoy (doot)

Our Reponse to Mulla:

This is a mythological story described in Purana having not happened in real history. But it is NOT a dream . Some people interpret that the only context where the mentioning of dream is in the end part of the Sloka number 23, where there is the mention of Muhammad coming at night in front of Raja bhoj after he was turned to ashes by Kalidasa, the military chief of Raja Bhoj. From the beginning it is not a dream and nowhere is it mentioned. So the first part till Sloka 22, the story is mentioned in a mythological frame. But not a Dream. Do you know why Mushafiq argues not to take things literally ? That is because he wants to distort the original story for his own vested interest. He is an ardent manipulator as well as Islam-obsessed Kashmiri Jihadi.

Mahamad : stands for prophet Muhammad ,as well as islam. This interpretation seems to be true
Raja Bhoj : Mushafiq is interpreting Raja Bhoja as innocent and dominant population of India. This is utter nonsense since a king is from Kshatriya clan and can never symbolize people. Moreover in the preamble, I have mentioned him launching military conquests to different other nations , defeated them and collected large amount of wealth. Do you thing Innocent Indian people would do that?
Kaalidas : Mushafiq is interpreting the military commander who had 10000 strong army as the shrewd Brahmins and Swamijis of India. How can a military commander become a Brahmin? Again Kalidasa ‘s characteristics are that of a Kshatriya, a warrior clan. You might argue about the existence of Brahmin kings, but since there were high movement in between different professions, a Brahmin once became a king or any of the military position, he was considered a Kshatriya.
Angelic being : Where in the above verses do mention about Angelic beings? NOWHERE. Maybe Mulla is referring to “deva” that appears in the verses 9, 15 and 23. Since the “Deva” is something divine , Mulla deviates its translation to “Angel”.

From this we can conclude that the interpretation itself is false and Mulla Mushafiq has created them only for self-serving purposes.

Translations of Slokas 7 and 8

भोजराज उवाच

True translation:

Bhojaraj said (To Shiva ) : I pray to you O Husband of Girija (Parvati Devi) , dweller of Arid regions , O Lord, you have committed many illusions so as to destroy Tripurasura the demon. You are invisible for the Barbarian Mlecchas,O Pure and having the form of Sacchidanada (Sat+chit+Ananda.). I have come to you seeking refuge . Now what would you like me to do?

MULLA MUSHAFIQ Says :

At that time a spiritual teacher (Acharya) known as Mahamad (Muhammad) appeared amongst the Mlecchas (non Indians/non Aryans), along with his companions/disciples. The King after giving this Mahaa Deva (of angelic disposition) dweller of the desert (Marusthal Nivasi), a bath in the Panchgavya and the Ganges water (meaning honouring and praising him) offered him presents and showing him all reverence said: “I pay obeisance to you (Namaste) O Pride of Humanity (Girija Nath) dweller of the desert (Marusthal Nivaasi/Arabian dweller). You are the destroyer of the Devil (Tripurasur Naashaaya) who propagates deceit. You have been protected from fellow Mlecchas, and you are the embodiment of Divine Qualities (Sacchidanand Roopine). I am a your servant, and have come seeking your refuge.

Few points come out of these verses.

1. Mahamad (Muhammad) has been called an Acharya (a spiritual teacher) of Mlecchas (the illiterate people).
2. The King Bhoj (innocent Indian people) will yearn to follow Prophet Muhammad with all humility and accept him as their teacher.
3. Muhammad is the destroyer of the Devil. Tripurasur in Puranic mythology stands for the Devil.
4. Muhammad is a dweller of the desert. It cannot refer to Lord Shiva of the Puranas because his abode is said to be the Mount Kailash in the Himlayas and not the desert.
5. The Prophet will be given protection against his enemies, the fellow Mlecchas.
6. Raja Bhoj washed the Prophet with Ganges water and Panchgavya. Since this is a vision, it cannot be taken literally but must be taken as symbolic for honour.
7. He is called as the embodiment of divine qualities.

Our Response to the treachery as shown above

Here is the biggest lie told by our polemicist Mulla. He simply changes the prayer of Raja Bhoj directed to lord Shiva (Mahaadeva) to Muhammad. He is even calling Muhammad as Mahaadeva and interprets the meaning of mahaadeva as some kind of Angelic disposition!!! This term itself is fraudulent and cunningly used so that there is no role for Lord Shiva in the entire story.A few questions to be asked to Mulla Mushafiq are as follows:

1.Mahadeva is a term used to call Lord Shiva since he is the great Lord. Here is a link for that http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shiva Our lord is not a simple Angelic disposition.

2.Marusthala nivasi : This term of Marusthala means an Arid region. Sanskrit word Marusthala has further meanings as (of land or a climate) Having little or no rain; too dry or barren to support vegetation: It does not necessarily mean the sandy desert.dry,barren,droughty,jejune areas can be called marusthal. Even Kailas is a marusthal since it is almost like a cold desert. Maybe Mulla is not aware of the existence of cold deserts. Reference is here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_Desert

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desert , Here you can see some images of Cold deserts. https://www.google.co.in/search?q=cold+deserts+in+ladakh&hl=en&rlz=1C1GGGE_enGR480GR480&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=KOlfUe-yBMPlrAeqiIDoAg&ved=0CDAQsAQ&biw=1024&bih=499

So your argument that Lord shiva is not a desert dweller is completely baseless since Kailash is a cold desert.

3. Tripurasura destroyer : There is an interesting story about how Lord Shiva destroyed Tripurasura.

Tripurasura’s Past life (Mythology –not from bhavishya purana)

Tripurasur was the son of Sage Gritsamad. One day the sage sneezed and from this was created a young boy who the Sage brought up as his own son. The sage taught the boy the Ganana Twam, Ganesh Mantra. Equipped with this mantra the boy meditated intensely on Lord Ganesh who ultimately blessed him. He was given three pura-s of gold silver and iron. Since he was the owner of these three pura-s he was given the name Tripur. Ganesh also bestowed on Tripur to be the most powerful, who none but Lord Shiva himself could destroy and after being destroyed by Lord Shiva he would attain mukti-salvation.
This boon made Tripur proud and he brought havoc in the entire world. He conquered the Nether world and then proceeded to takeover Heaven. He defeated Indra the king of heaven. His aggression made Lord Brahma hide in a lotus and Lord Vishnu in the kshirsagar. He soon also took over Lord Shiva’s Kailash Parvat and thus became the King of all the three worlds. The gods wondered on how to vanquish Tripurasur. Lord Narada told them that, since he had been granted a boon by Lord Ganesh himself it would be very difficult to vanquish him. He advised them to meditate on Lord Ganesh. Pleased Lord Ganesh decided to help the Gods.
Disguised as brahmin he visited Tripurasur and told him that he was a very enlightened Brahmin and could make for him three flying planes. Riding these he woud be able to go anywhere he wished within minutes. The planes could only be destroyed by Shiva.In return Lord Ganesh asked him to get him the statue of Chintamani which was at the Kailash Mountain. Lord Shiva refused to give the statue to Tripurasur’s messenger. The angry Tripurasur himself went to get the statue. A fierce battle started between him and Lord Shiva. He destroyed everything that belonged to the Lord Shiva who too retired to the Girikandar.
Lord Shiva too realized that he was unable to destroy Tripurasur because he had not paid his respects to Lord Ganesh. He recited the Shadaakshar Mantra to invoke Ganesh. On doing so from his mouth emerged Gajanan to grant Shiva a boon. Shiva continued his invocation of Ganesh who ultimately directed him on how Tripurasur could be killed. Lord Shiva was asked to recite the Sahasranam and then direct an arrow at the three pura-s of Tripurasur.
Lord Shiva followed these instructions and finally vanquished Tripurasur.
The place where Lord Shiva invoked Lord Ganesh he also created a temple for him. The town surrounding this temple was called Manipur. The village Ranjangaon is considered to be the place where Lord Shiva himself sought the blessings of Ganesh and ultimately destroyed Tripurasur.

Mulla Mushafiq, you cannot take the credit of killing Tripurasura for Muhammad. Since from Puranas it is very clear that Lord Shiva only killed Tripurasura.

Mushafiq is distorting the meaning of “Mlecchair guptaya” as having been protected from fellow mlecchas. But gupt in Sanskrit means being invisible/hidden since Lord Shiva is invisible to barbarians and wicked people.And such crooks can never attain him.

Meaning of Sacchidananda

The description comprises the three Sanskrit words sat-chit-ananda:

sat सत् (present participle); [Sanskrit root as, “to be“]”Truth”, “Absolute Being”,”a palpable force of virtue and truth”.Sat describes an essence that is pure and timeless, that never changes.
cit चित् (noun): “consciousness”,”true consciousness”,”to be consciousness of”,”to understand”,”to comprehend”.
ānanda आनन्द (noun): “bliss”,”true bliss”,”happiness”, “joy”, “delight”, “pleasure”

“Sat-Chit-Ananda” or “Saccidānanda” is the Sanskrit compound form of the word,which can be translated in various ways:

“Eternal Bliss Consciousness”
“Absolute Bliss Consciousness”
“Consisting of existence and thought and joy”

For further information, please refer to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satcitananda

How can Mahammad who was child abuser, paedophile, desert pirate and slave merchant, mass murderer, schizophrenic, misogynist, polygynist, war criminal, Jew hater, liar, war booty collector and such a lowly person can become Sacchidananda?Muhammad is a great sinner and surely he is rotting in hellfire now. That picture of Muhammad in hellfire can be depicted as shown below. Without a doubt, Sacchidananda is Lord Shiva.

Muhammad is Girija Nath? Absolutely NOT .Girija (Giri + Ja) means Parvati in Sanskrit language, daughter of Himalaya So Girija nath means the Lord or Husband of Parvati .ie, Lord Shiva. How did Mulla get the meaning of Girija nath as the “pride of humanity” is known only to him.

Now let us examine next six slokas : (Shloka 9-14)

सूत उवाच

True Translation:

Sri Suta Gosvami said : After hearing this prayer by Raja Bhoj, Lord Shiva spoke to him that he (Raja Bhoj) needs to go to a place called Mahakaaleshwar. A land which is contaminated by barbarian ,wicked Mleccha people is called Vaahika . In that horrendous land, there is no Aryan Religion (Noble Religion= Hinduism). There was a great illusionist who was burnt by me in the past. His name is Tripura demon ,who has returned after ordered by another Devil named Bali. He is Origin-less (Ayoni) ,but he had received benediction from me . His name is Mahaamad (Muhammad) and his deeds are like a ghost – a pishacha (meat eater). Therefore O King ,you should not travel to that land of evil ghosts (pishachas) .By my mercy, your purification will take place. After hearing this ,Raja Bhoj returned to his native land. Mahaamad came along with him to the bank of river Sindhu (Indus).

MULLA MUSHAFIQ’s tricks:

You have seen how that treacherous Mulla has distorted the truth in the initial stanzas by, (1) fraudulently calling Muhammad as Mahadeva instead of Lord Shiva – here one thing to be noted most importantly that the verses would have been “नृपश्चैव महामदम्” had it been intended for addressing Muhammad, not ambiguous terms like “ नृपश्चैव महादेवम् “ addressing Mahaadeva. At least the author of the verses in Bhavishya Purana could have used the Sanskrit term “बालिका योनी शोषकम्” in order to emphasise the Paedophilic nature of Islamic Prophet Muhammad (Pig Piss Be Upon Him) .Then Mulla Mushafiq’s argument could have been true Since Muhammad was a child abuser and sexual predator lusting on child Aisha when she was 6,and having sex with her at the age of 9 and he was 54 years at that time.

(2) Due to ignorance calling only Arabia as desert, while excluding the Kailash mountain and its surroundings which are also Cold desert places.

(3) By arguing that Pachagavya abhisheka and Ganga water bath did not take place but merely honouring him in not so literal sense.

(4) By DECEPTIVELY translating Girija Nath as the “pride of Humanity” (5) And by attributing the credit of killing Tripurasura ,not by Lord Shiva, but by Muhammad, ———-Mushafiq shows the extreme Taqiyya ,the religiously sanctioned lie.

MULLA MUSHAFIQ’S FAULTY TRANSLATIONS OF VERSES 9-14.

“Suta Goswami said: After hearing the king’s praises, an angel (dev) said to him. “O Bhojraj, go to the place Mahakaaleshwar (in other words, look at the condition of that place). The Mlecchas have spoiled the well known land of the Arabs (Vahika Desh). Arya Dharm (the religion of truth in Indian parlance) is not to be found in that country. Before also there had appeared this Satan (Tripurasura: denoting Satanic times) whom I had killed. He has come again (meaning Satanic times have returned) by the order of the Devil. To show the right path to these misguided people and guide them to the truth, the well known Muhammad, who has been given the epithet of Brahma (Ayoni), is busy in bring the Pishachas (meat-eaters) to the right path. Therefore, O King, you need not go to this land of the foolish Pishachas. Through my mercy you will be sanctified here itself (in your own land). Hearing this the King returned to his country. Mahamada (Muhammad, signifying Islam) also came to the banks of the Sindhu””

Few points come out of these verses.

1. The condition of Arabia will deteriorate and it will corrupted by evil-doers. Qurán has verified this condition prevailing in Arabia at the time of Prophet Muhammad in these words, “ظَهَرَ الْفَسَادُ فِي الْبَرِّ وَالْبَحْرِ بِمَا كَسَبَتْ أَيْدِي النَّاسِ Corruption has appeared throughout the land and sea by [reason of] what the hands of people have earned [Surah Rum 30: Verse 41]“
2. The True Religion is not found there. Here, the Sanskrit terms Arya Dharm do not refer to Hinduism, but to the true religion in Indian parlance. This true religion of Ibraheem (Abraham/Brahma) had disappeared from Arabia. The Qurán has used the terms Deeni Hunafa and Deen al-Qayyim to describe this true religion, “وَمَا أُمِرُوا إِلَّا لِيَعْبُدُوا اللَّهَ مُخْلِصِينَ لَهُ الدِّينَ حُنَفَاءَ وَيُقِيمُوا الصَّلَاةَ وَيُؤْتُوا الزَّكَاةَ ۚ وَذَٰلِكَ دِينُ الْقَيِّمَةِ And they have been commanded no more than this: To worship Allah, offering Him sincere devotion, being true (in faith); to establish regular prayer; and to practice regular charity; and that is the Religion Right and Straight. [Surah Bayyinah 98: verse 4]“
3. The present enemies of Prophet Muhammad and the Satanic elements will perish just like they perished in previous times such as the enemies of Prophet Noah, Lut, Saalih, Shuayb, Moses, Abraham etc the great civilizations like Aad, Thamud, Pharaoh, Namrud, etc perished ultimately. The word Tripurasur in this passage does not just stand for some mythological demon, but to the Satanic order. Remember this is a dream .
4. In order to guide these misguided people Prophet Muhammad has been given the epithet of Brahma (Abraham) and he is busy in reforming his Arabian people. Hindus have mistranslated the term Ayoni as ‘having no origin’. If we adopt this meaning, the sentence becomes meaningless. Actually, in Hindu tradition, Ayoni is a title of Brahma (Brahma is sanskritized version of Abraham). The reason for giving Prophet Muhammad, the epithet of Brahma, is because just like Abraham (Brahma) fought against the sinfulness and idolatry of his time, similarly Prophet Muhammad will fight the idolatry of his time.
5. King Bhoj (standing for the Indian people) will not have to go to Arabia. They will be purified when Muslims will arrive in India. So now that the Muslims have arrived in India, the Hindus should convert to Islam.

Our Response to this treachery as shown above:

1).Mushafiq Sultan translates the quotes from Lord Shiva as that from an “angel “ now. Where did this angel suddenly appear from nowhere? There is not any reference in the original shlokas saying “in other words, look at the condition of that place”. It is a kind of denigration done by our polemicist Mulla.

2) Mulla wants to distort the meaning of “Arya Dharma” as Islam. For that he tries to water down the translation as “Arya Dharma=Religion of Truth in Indian Parlance= Islam in Indian parlance” . AT LEAST MULLA SHOULD HAVE EXHIBITED SOME SHAME IN SAYING SO. In order to use the term “Religion of Truth “, the Sanskrit term should have been “सत्य धर्म” but here in order to denote the religion of Aryas , which was the ancient historic Vedic Religion , the term Arya Dharma is used. It is NEVER EVER that blood thirsty Middle Eastern death cult called Islam.

Lord Shiva is telling there is No Noble Religion=Arya Dharma= Historic Vedic Religion in the terrible Mleccha (Barbarian) contaminated land of Vaahika.

The Islamic supremacist Mulla Mushafiq should note that we Hindus can also claim your argument the other way around.

For example, Bismillahir Rahmanir Raheem= The most benevolent , most merciful God= Dayaavan Ki Jai= Dayanand Ki Jai= Hail to Swami Dayanand Ji=Hail to satyarth Prakaash= Jai Ho to Rigveda,Samaveda, Atharva veda and Yajurveda. So the basic deep meaning of Bismillahir Rahimaanir Raheem is hailing the Vedas and since this deep meaning is revealed, muslims must now convert to Arya Samaji brand of Vedic Hinduism.

Also Islam=Submission to the will of God= Submission to Sacchidananda= Submission to Hinduism . So basic meaning of Islam= Submission to the will of Hinduism.

3) Here also the legend of Tripurasur is mentioned. “Tripuro Balidaityena Preshita: Punaraagata:” means Tripurasura has returned by the order of Bali Demon. “Ayoni: Sa varo matta: praptavan daityavardhana: “ means He was Ayoni= Origin less = Since the Evil has no origin.He received Benediction/boon from me but after that his arrogance got exceeded. “Mahaamada iti khyata: paishachakriti tatpara: “ means his name ,ie, the returned Tripurasua’s incarnation’s name is Mahaamad (Muhammad) and his deeds are that of a meat eating Pishacha (ghost).

There is no ambiguity here that Devil Tripurasura’s incarnation is Muhammad , in another words Muhammd was an evil demon and his religion of Islam is most devilish cult. If you see the present circumstances of different parts of the world, who needs further proof regarding Islam as the devilish religion?

Mushafiq mulla is translating the meaning as “ Muhammad is bringing Pishachas to right path. I want to ask him how can he translate “Paishacha kriti tatpara:” as bringing to right path? Which Sanskrit Dictionary has the reference? Its our open challenge to the Kashmiri Jihadist to refute our claim, if he is competent enough.

Kriti tatpara: in Sanskrit can be translated to “interested in the deeds of”. There can be no other meaning.

4) Mulla reminds us that this is a dream. IN FACT IT IS NEITHER A DREAM NOR A VISION. There is no mention of dream ( Swapnam) either in the verses 5 to8 or 9 to 14.

5)Ayoni = Having no Origin. Here the term denotes that the Devish activies of Tripurasur has no origin. That is an INTRINSIC characteristic. There is no harm in adopting this meaning and the sentence does not sound absurd as claimed by Mulla .

Here also Mulla claims deception as he had attempted before that Ayoni= Epithet of Brahma in Hindu tradition = Brahma= sanskritised term for Ibraheem= Fight against idolatry= Muhammad will fight against it . Totally ABSURD.

Brahma is Not Ibraheem and Muhammad is neither Mahaadeva.

There is a limit to all fraud, it is our duty to expose it , otherwise if left unchecked, innocent, naïve people will fall into the trap.

Again we hindus can claim like this,

Allahu Akbar= God is great =God is one = Ekam sat vipro bahudha vadanti =Emerging monism in historic vedic religion= Rigvedic prayer = indication of Rigveda = The basic teaching of Hinduism= Now Muslims need to convert to Hinduism = Join Arya Samaj en masse.

As per Mulla’s logic, we Hindus can claim that the inherent meaning of Muslim prayer Allahu Akbar is Muslims should enroll themselves to Arya Samaj after undergoing Shuddhi purification ceremony.

6)The 14^th Shloka says, After Lord Shiva advised Raja Bhoj not to travel to Vaahika (Arabia), he returned to India. And Muhammad accompanied him to the banks of Sindhu River.Since the leader/Acharya/ teacher of Mleccha barbarians was Muhammad, and since he is the incarnation of Tripurasua demon ,and since his deeds are like that of a ghost, This end part does not mean Since muslims have arrived in India, Hindus need to convert to Islam. But it means that since Arabia is contaminated by Mleccha Islamic religion, Raja Bhoj and his subjects should avoid going there and since Indians were following Arya Dharma,the noble religion of Hinduism, they are warned against Muslim Mlecchas who are very violent in their character.

Muhammad accompanied Raja Bhoj to the banks of River Sindhu. There is a deep meaning to this incidence. In the 7^th century during the times of Muhammad, there was the Zoroastrian religion following Persians in the neighborhood who used to donate food and clothes to needy Arabs in the desert land of Arabia. Persian Empire was a very prosperous empire at that time and in Arabia there was nothing, but only Sand. Arabs would usually come near the borders of Persian empire to beg and at times loot the caravans travelling there. They were definitely Evil snakes who would bite at the hands that feed them. In order to remind this historical fact, bhavishya purana mentions that Muhammad accompanied Raja Bhoj to the banks of river Sindhu which was the traditional boundary of India.

The Correct Translations of the verses 15 to 22

उवाच भूपतिं प्रेम्णा मायामदविशारद:l तव देवो महाराज मम दासत्वमागत :ll १५

म्लेच्छ धर्मे मतिश्चासीत्तस्य भूपस्य दारुणे ll १७

TRUE TRANSLATION

An expert illusionist and arrogant (maya mada visharad) Mahaamad now spoke affectionately to the king Raja Bhoj, O king your God has become my servant. Now watch your God eating my leftover (remnant) food.Raja Bhoja after hearing this and after seeing this illusion, became highly amazed. He was attracted to that terrible barbaric Mleccha religion and was mulling to convert to it. After hearing this, Kaalidaas, the military commander of Raja Bhoj angrily rebuked Muhammad “ O Racal, You wicked Crook, you have created an illusion to deceive and hypnotize /bewilder my King, I will kill you the evil doer- the lowest among men….” After saying this that twice-born Military chief sweared and condemned Muhammad .He issued a bane (cursed) to Muhammad . Muhammad was turned to ashes and attained the status of the Lord (God) of Barbarians. His disciples, the fellow barbarian Mlecchas became engulfed in fear and highly frightened, fled to Vaahika Land , they carried away, the ashes of their teacher and reached Madeena (Mada heena pura –A place free from intoxication). They placed the ashes of Muhammad in the centre of that land and became arrogant again( mada tatpara: ) . That city is called Madeena and it was established as the centre of their pilgrimage.

MULLA MUSHAFIQ’S Deceptive Translation

This prince (i.e. Muhammad), full of wisdom, affectionately said to the King: “O King, your deities are my servants. Just see, they eat my leftover food”. Hearing this argument and seeing this, the King was surprised and was mulling to convert to this foreign religion. Then in terrible anger, Kalidas rebuked Mahamada (Muhammad) by saying, “O cheat, you have bewildered the King, with your wisdom. I will kill you, the wicked person that you are.”

Points come out of this passage

As you can see the Hindus are consistently mistranslating some words and not translating some other words. The words “the King was surprised and was mulling to convert to this foreign religion” are not given by the Hindu translation. This shows their intellectual dishonesty. Now, here are the inferences from this passage:

1. The Hindus here mistranslated the word Maayaa as illusion, when in reality it also carries the meaning of Wisdom (See Monier Williams Sanskrit-English Dictionary). Even in Rigveda 1/11/7 , the word Maayaa has been used in a positive sense for Lord Indra who is supposed to have resorted to Maayaa in order to defeat his enemies. मायाभिरिन्द्र मायिनं तवं शुष्णमवातिरः | The wily Śuṣṇa, Indra! thou overthrew with your wondrous powers.
2. As all these events are happening in a dream, we need to interpret them properly. Now here, Prophet Muhammad reasons AFFECTIONATELY with Raja Bhoj (the Indian people), that the things/animals you worship in Hinduism, eat our leftover food. How then do they deserve our worship? This is the Prophetic method of argument. Prophets have an affection towards the people to whom they are sent. The Prophets urge people to use their mind and turn to the worship of one God, and leave the senseless worship of animals and other created things. The Prophet speaks wisely and affectionately with the people hoping that they will understand. Do they understand?
3. Yes, Raja Bhoj, (symbolizing the majority of the people), is attracted to the plain message of the Prophet Muhammad. The people know that this argument is good and they feel attracted to Islam and think of converting to Islam. This is true even of modern times. Whenever the polytheistic people are questioned that how can you worship something which is lower than humans, they agree in their heart to this truth.
4. But here comes the hurdle. As soon as the shrewd Brahmin priests (symbolized by Kalidas) get to know that the Indian people are attracted to Islam and will convert to Islam, they start their mischievous propaganda. Their most effective trick is to vilify Islam, insult the Prophet and try to ruin his image in the minds of the ordinary Hindus, so that people are no longer attracted to Islam. They even try to kill the Prophet (Muslims), because they have no knowledgeable response to the plain questions. This same strategy is being spoken of in this passage. Kalidas (i.e. the shrewd Brahmins), not able to respond to the plain argument of the Prophet (and Muslims), starts to rebuke the Prophet and call him insulting titles like cheat, fraud, magician, etc. This attitude of the enemies of Islam is even spoken of in the Holy Qurán in these words. فَلَمَّا جَاءَهُمُ الْحَقُّ مِنْ عِنْدِنَا قَالُوا إِنَّ هَٰذَا لَسِحْرٌ مُبِينٌ “When the Truth did come to them from Us, they said: “This is indeed evident magic!” [Surah Yunus 10: verse 76] فَلَمَّا جَاءَتْهُمْ آيَاتُنَا مُبْصِرَةً قَالُوا هَٰذَا سِحْرٌ مُبِينٌ “But when Our Signs came to them, that should have opened their eyes, they said: “This is sorcery manifest!” [Surah Naml 27: verse 13] إِنَّ الَّذِينَ يَكْفُرُونَ بِآيَاتِ اللَّهِ وَيَقْتُلُونَ النَّبِيِّينَ بِغَيْرِ حَقٍّ وَيَقْتُلُونَ الَّذِينَ يَأْمُرُونَ بِالْقِسْطِ مِنَ النَّاسِ فَبَشِّرْهُمْ بِعَذَابٍ أَلِيمٍ “As to those who deny the Signs of Allah and in defiance of right, slay the prophets, and slay those who teach just dealing with mankind, announce to them a grievous penalty.” [Surah Aalim Imran 3: verse 21]

The lesson in this passage of Bhavishya Purana is that people of India should not fall in the tricks of shrewd Brahmin priests like VHP/RSS/Arya Samaj/ISKCON/Art of Living/Agniveer/Ramdev etc. They should ignore their propaganda against Islam and Prophet Muhammad and embrace the religion of Prophet Muhammad, who loves them and is affectionate to them.

Our Response to the above translation by Islamic apologetic Mulla Mushafiq

1)Mulla dishonestly portrays the meaning of “maya mada visharada:” as “full of wisdom. In fact the truth is arrogant and master illusionist. He wants to create the base of wisdom for Muhammad, while the fact is just the opposite.

2) I have mentioned in my own translations that Raja Bhoja after seeing the illusion created by Muhammad, was attracted towards that terrible ( Darune) Mleccha religion. And he was mulling to convert to it. Note that the verse is “म्लेच्छ धर्मे मतिश्चासीत्तस्य भूपस्य दारुणे” Here why does Mushafiq omits the translation of ‘दारुणे’? Clearly shown that Islam is a terrible religion, a fact Mulla wants to hide

3) “माया ते निर्मिता धूर्त नृपमोहन हेतवे ll१८ हनिष्यामि दुराचारम् वाहिकं पुरुषाधमं l” This is the rebuke that Kaalidas gave to Muhammad. It means “with your illusion, so as to bewilder the king, I will kill you, O rascal, you wicked crook, the lowest among men”

But our Mulla Mushafiq mistranslates as “O cheat, you have bewildered the King, with your wisdom. I will kill you, the wicked person that you are” As everyone can see that the word “wisdom” was inserted and “lowest among men” was omitted by Mulla. Mulla should think that one who called Muhammad as” Lowest among men “ (purushadhama) will ever use the term Wisdom as he claims that Maaya has another meaning /synonym ? that too in a positive sense? People are not fools to accept such fraud.

4) Mulla mentions Rigveda 1/11/7

The All World Gayatri Parivar gives the translations as shown below

Now Ralph Griffith translates the same verse as

“The wily Susna, Indra! thou o’er-threwest with thy wondrous powers.

The wise beheld this deed of thine: now go beyond their eulogies.”

Here you can see the quality of wisdom is attributed to the people, not Indra. So Maaya as per Rigveda 1/11/7 is wonderous powers or illusion. Mushafiq failed even in this claim. There is a vast difference between “wisdom” and “wonderous powers”

5) Again Mulla claims that these events are happening in a Dream. While it is NOT. Show me the single instance that this is a Dream. There should have been a Sanskrit word mentioned as “स्वप्ने” had it been a dream. But nowhere in the verses, such a word or its synonyms are to be found.

6) Mulla should understand that Hindus do NOT worship Animals. Maybe you can see Hanuman, Matsyavatar, Koormavatar, Varahavatar, Narasimha , Or Sree Ganesha, they are all mythological characters showing the fight between good and evil. These incarnations or Avatars of God to earth occurred in different epochs and different ages to fight the Evil during respective times . We believe in Nirguna Brahman and Saguna Brahman. And why should God become jealous of idolatry or polytheism? Is he so insecure? Then you need to agree that he is an insecure God which is a human character.

http://img534.imageshack.us/img534/1025/theincarnationofvishnu.jpg

Since this topic is vast , I will describe about it as another article.

Can’t we question the actions of a so-called prophet who boasted to get revelations while sitting in cave Hira? When we do, muslims will be left speechless. For further reference kindly go through the following links:

5. http://pretmetmohammed.wordpress.com

6. skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran

6) Mulla needs to first of all organize the muslim community and advise them not to protest or show any kind of genocidal rage when a Quran is burnt. Since Quran is nothing, but a book with paper and some print ink. Isn’t it a form of idolatry that a book – which cannot talk, smile, not even move itself –itself became an object of worship?

We have seen many riots in Pakistan and Afghanistan or Iraq whenever a Quran is desecrated either in the west or in those countries where that ‘crime’ of ‘blasphemy’ is done by other religionists.

Mulla should educate muslims not to throw stones at Jamra which symbolizes the Satan. Jamra is a set of concrete walls representing Satan and All the Hajis are expected to throw pebbles at it. Isn’t it another form of Idolatry?

What about the Black stone of Kaaba? Why don’t you people destroy that or move to some museum if it is not considered divine?

7) Mulla speaks about Kalidas, the military commander of Raja Bhoj ,and likens him to Brahmin class. Now let us see what happens the other way around. What will be the fate of a muslim if he /she ever tries to convert to another religion? Ie, Apostate of islam? Apostasy (ارتداد, irtidād and ridda) i.e. the rejection of faith, is a serious offense in Islam. The punishment for apostasy as prescribed by Prophet Muhammad is death. A murtad (مرتد apostate) who hides his apostasy is referred to as a munāfiq (منافق hypocrite).

I am reproducing an article from an Islam-exposing website. You can read it here or below . http://wikiislam.net/wiki/Apostacy

Introduction to Apostasy

Definitions

In Islam, the rejection in part (of any of the pillars, or individual principles of Islam), or discarding the faith as a whole, amounts to apostasy.It is not a quick or easy affair for an apostate or heterodox believer of Islam, as the punishment for apostasy in the Islamic faith is death. Though it may be argued that this is not clear through the Qur’an alone, scholars have found justification for the penalty from within its pages, and there are also numerous Sahih (authentic) hadiths confirming this punishment as attested by Prophet Muhammad. In Sahih Bukhari, we see it as “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him’”, and it was also one of only three reasons given by him where killing a Muslim is permitted.

Historical Context

An evaluation of Islam’s attitude to apostasy would not be complete without expounding on the political make up of the religion. Islam is essentially a tribal system that once was the social composition of Arabia in the north. Society, in its absolute sense, had never been in existence in the north prior to Islam. All that existed there were certain assemblages that never flourished or evolved into a fully fledged society for several reasons; one being, that most at that time were nomads wandering throughout the desert. Religion was not a personal but communal affair in pre-Islamic Arabia. Deserting religion thus amounted to treason and so was punishable by death. The death penalty being incorporated into Islam for apostasy is better understood when viewed through this tribal prism. Muhammad once belonged to this way of life, but reshuffled society and he did so by organizing certain tribes under one roof without sacrificing much of the already existing norms. Muhammad was successful and, thus, did not venture to get rid of the pre-existing tribal prescripts. Instead, he assimilated them into his new religion. The prescribed punishment for apostasy was one such practice which Muhammad annexed.

Early Islam

We do not know of any apostates being killed during the lifetime of Muhammad for the specific crime of apostasy. This is largely due to the lack of individuals apostatizing during Muhammad’s life. However in one Sahih Bukhari hadith, Muhammad is seen deporting a Bedouin who desired to discard his religion. This incident alone does not indicate Muhammad viewing apostasy as anything less than treason or a crime worthy of death. This alleged incident occurred during the early stages of Islam in Medina where Muhammad’s Islam and its revelations were incomplete and a far cry from the all encompassing way of life it was to become by the time of his death. After the death of Muhammad and under the Caliphate of Abu Bakr, many apostates had been killed during the lengthy “Riddah (apostasy) wars”. This attests to the fact that apostasy had already become a serious crime within Islam and was not some later innovation. In fact, it was a Qur’anic versewhich prompted Abu Bakr to fight against the people who refused to pay tithe. These people were not rejecting Islam as a whole but only refusing to abide by one of its five pillars (Zakat). As historians will testify, Abu Bakr took up arms against them in a bloody war which lasted for over a year (632–633 CE). The Caliph did not put down his arms until all rejectors were either killed or had reverted back into the fold of Islam. There are also many narrations which record Muhammad’s command being followed by his companions, with atheists, Christians, and Jewsbeing put to death for leaving Islam.

Shari’ah

Islamic jurisdiction on Apostasy is derived from the words of Muhammad and the aforementioned actions of the Caliph and other companions. If rejecting one of the pillars of Islam is considered to be a crime warranting war against such people, it is only logical for the prescribed punishment for apostasy in Islam to be death. Imam Abu Hanifa’s prescript as seen in Al-Shybani’s Kitab al-Siyar grants the apostate a stipulated period (no more than a couple of days) to revert back to Islam or face the death penalty. All four schools of Islamic jurisprudence are in agreement with this ruling, with only slight variations on whether to allow the grace period. The Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence believe female apostates are an exception to the rule and are not to be killed, but beaten and put under confinement until death or repentance, while the remaining Shafi’i, Maliki, and Hanbali schools all agree the verdict for the female apostate is the same as for the male.

So with all points considered, we can rightly conclude that the ruling of Islam is to put apostates to death if they refuse to revert back to their Islamic faith. This ruling remains true even among the Shi’ite sect, whom together with the Sunnis constitute almost the entirety of the world’s Muslim population.

Primary Articles Exploring Islam and Apostasy

The following are summaries of pages discussing Islam, in relation to Apostasy:

Islamic Writing and Apostasy

Islamic scriptures and scholars have much to say in regards to apostasy.

Narrated Ikrima: Ali burnt some people and this news reached Ibn ‘Abbas, who said, “Had I been in his place I would not have burnt them, as the Prophet said, ‘Don’t punish (anybody) with Allah’s Punishment.’ No doubt, I would have killed them, for the Prophet said, ‘If somebody (a Muslim) discards his religion, kill him.’ ”

Sahih Bukhari 4:52:260

Apostasy and Human Rights

The full text taken from a paper that was presented by scholar Ibn Warraq at a panel discussion on “Apostasy, Human Rights, Religion and Belief” held at the the 60^th Session of the UN Commission on Human Rights, held in Geneva, 18^th April 2005.

Apostasy Laws and Their Impact on the Real World

Ex-Muslims are often persecuted, abused and killed by Muslims. This treatment of apostates is not simply down to the issue of state-enforced religion as some may suggest. The violence or threats of violence against apostates in the Muslim world usually derives, not from government authorities, but from family members and individuals from the Islamic communities themselves, who operate very often with impunity from the government. This point is further emphasized by the persecution and murder of ex-Muslims which has now become evident in many non-Muslim societies. For example; in 2007 the daughter of a British Imam was taken under police protection after receiving death threats from her father (a leader of a mosque in Lancashire) for converting to Christianity. While the plight of the ex-Muslim is largely ignored by the mainstream media, thanks to the internet we can often catch a glimpse of their untold suffering.

Notable Former Muslims

Whilst apostatizing from the Islamic faith is a dangerous thing to do, in addition to movie stars and rappers, many outspoken Muslim preachers, mullahs, imams, scholars, missionaries and even terrorists have apostatized and become atheists, Buddhists, Christians, Hindu’s etc. In doing so, many (including Ibn Warraq and Mark Gabriel) have taken it upon themselves to oppose the Islamic ideology and have become celebrities in their own right.

Muslims Leaving Islam by the Millions

Muslims often (sometimes falsely) advertise news of non-Muslims converting to Islam, but they don’t tell the other side of the story, where Muslims are also leaving Islam. There are more Muslims leaving Islam today than there are new converts joining it.In Sub-Saharan Africa alone, 6 million Muslims are leaving Islam each and every year. Once the majority faith of the continent, they are now the minority with Christianity being the majority. The sheer volume of recent apostates is unprecedented in the history of Islam.

Majority of Today’s Muslims favor Death for Apostates

For almost 1,400 years, the punishment for apostasy has been death. Only recently has this been challenged, mainly by Islamic apologists in the West. A Pew poll released on December 2, 2010, found that even today “The majority of Muslims would favor changing current laws in their countries to “allow stoning as punishment for adultery, hand amputation for theft, and death for those who convert from Islam as their religion”.

To give you an idea of the kind of figures we’re dealing with, we’ll use Pakistan as an example; the 2010 poll found that 76% of Pakistanis agree apostates are to be killed. In a country with a population of 172,800,000 (96% of whom are Muslim)that would be 126,074,880 individuals in a single country. Conversely only a mere 13% of Muslims opposed killing apostates. If we are to assume the politically-correct position that, Muslims who espouse such views are extremists who misunderstand the ‘peaceful’ teachings of Islam, then we must also concede the fact that the majority of Muslims in the world are extremists. They are not simply a ‘fringe group’.

Have you ever seen a Hindu , Sikh, Buddhist, Jain,Parsi, Or any member of the numerous Christian denominations demanding death penalty for the Apostates from their religions? Had it been the case, then there would not have been alive the famous atheist Dravidar Kazhagam founder Periyar Ramaswamy, Sanal Edamarku, M.Karunanidhi, Kancha Ilaiyah, Romila Thapar, and other CPI/CPI(M) leaders like Pinarayi Vijayan, V.S.Achuthanandan, E.M.Sankaran Namboodirippad, A.K.Gopalan, etc…

8) Mulla is advising Hindus not to fall into the propaganda of VHP/RSS/ BJP/ Art of Living/ Arya Samaj/ Baba Ramdev/ Agniveer. “उवाच भूपतिं प्रेम्णा” He exaggerates the “Premna(Affection) “ shown by Mahaamad to Raja Bhoj. If someone speaks Affectionately to you , should you convert to his religion? Especially becoming a slave of and having an Entrance-only- no-exit religion like Islam?

It should be remembered that upon joining Islam, genital mutilation (circumcision) take place. Upon leaving , they cut your neck—–that too LEGALLY.

Now we need to scrutinize the Shlokas 23 to 27.

True Translation

In the Night He (Muhammad who was burnt to ashes by Kaalidas), -the great illusionist attained the form of a Meat eating ghost , appeared in front of Raja Bhoj and spoke to him. “O King, your Arya Dharma (Noble Religion=Hinduism) is accepted as the best among all other religions. But by the order of Lord,I will establish a demoniac terrible religion.My followers will cut their genitals (circumcision-both male and female) ,they will not grow Shikha (A tuft of hair grown at the crown of the head of male Vaishnavas) , they will grow beard, and they will be polluters.They will make loud noises, Eat everything,without performing any rituals.This is my opinion.They will perform purificatory act with a musala or pestle as you do so with a Kusha. Therefore they will be called as Musalman and they will become the polluters of Religion.And thus will be my ghostly meat-eating religion established by me .

End of the story

After hearing this Raja Bhoj went to his place and Ghost Tripurasura incarnate Muhammad disappeared.The intelligent king, Bhojaraj established the language of Sanskrit in three varnas – the brahmanas, kshatriyas and vaisyas – and for the shudras he established prakrita-bhasha, the ordinary language spoken by common men. After ruling his kingdom for 50 years, he went to the heavenly planet. The moral laws established by him were honored even by the demigods. The arya-varta, the pious land is situated between Vindhyachala and Himachala or the mountains known as Vindhya and Himalaya. The Aryans reside there, but varna-sankaras reside on the lower part of Vindhya. The musalman people were kept on the other side of the river Sindhu.

On the island of Barbara, Tusha and many others also the followers of Isamsiha were also situated as they were managed by a king of demigods.

This is the picture of Muhammad devil on his javeline travelling to meet Raja bhoj

Mulla Mushafiq ‘s deceptive translation

That city is known as their site of pilgrimage, a place which was Madina or free from intoxication. An angelic being (Dev/standing for God’s envoy), in the form of a Pisacha appeared at night in front of king Bhojaraja and said: O king, your Arya Dharma has been known as the best religion among all, still I am now going to establish a strong meat-eating religion by the order of the Lord. The peculiar features of my followers will be that they will be circumcised, have no shikha, having a beard, revolutionary, make Azaan (call to prayer) loudly and will assimilate all religions. They will eat animals without performing elaborate Hindu rituals. They will purified with the musala or a pestle as you purify your things with kusha. They will be known as Musalmaan, and will refute the (false) religion. This the meat-eating religion will be founded by me. After having heard all this the king came back to his palace and that angelic being also went away.

Points to be considered.

1. The city of Madina is spoken as being free from intoxication (Mad Heen). We know that wine barrels were emptied in the streets of Madina, never to be refilled. This is a righteous city.
2. The angelic being (devroop) here is a God’s envoy who is informing the Indian people of the features of Muslims.
3. Arya Dharma will be substituted by Islam, as the old religion has become corrupted. We all know that the Vedas, Upanishads, Mahabharata, Gita, and Purans have become corrupted. Vedas are not studied by common masses anymore and they are too voluminous to be books of daily guidance. For this reason, the Holy Qurán is substituting them.
4. God will establish the meat eating religion. Hinduism had wrongly become vegetarian and abadoned meat eating under the influence of Buddhism and Jainism. Otherwise in Vedas and other Hindu scriptures, meat eating is allowed. Now Islam will be again allowing consumption of meat. The word Pishacha Dharma in this passage has been wrongly translated by the Hindus as a demoniac religion. It actually means meat eating religion. Because meat eating in corrupted Hinduism had been looked down upon as demoniac act, therefore the Pishacha was equated to demon. Otherwise from its root, it stands for meat. पिशित in Sanskrit means flesh or meat; पेशी means a lump of flesh or meat. So highlighting one word just to deceive ordinary Hindus in thinking of Islam as a demoniac religion, is real demoniac behaviour of the shrewd Brahmins, (depicted by Kalidas).
5. This passage also speaks of the features of Muslims, which we all know of. I will only explain few of the contentious words because they tend to be emphasized by the Hindu blog. The passage uses the word Dushaka (दूषक) which normally is thought to mean polluted. However, in Sanskrit it carries another meaning of दोष Dosha (Blame; Objection; Refutation). Some of the meanings of the word दूषण Dooshana in V.S. Apte’s Practical Sanskrit-English Dictionaryare,

Adverse argument
Criticism
Objection
Refutation

Therefore, Dharmadooshaka in this context here will mean refuter of false religion. One that will put false religious beliefs and practices in the dock and abandon them. Now, when it does so, obviously, from the perspective of the people of those false religions, it will a pollution or corruption of their false religion. So, if we adopt that meaning also, it is perfectly okay. It is a fact that Islam refutes the false ideas like Caste System, which was made the integral part of Hindu Religion. To the Hindus, who believe in this system, certainly, abolishing caste is a corruption in Hindu religion, because without Caste System there is no Hinduism. So, Islam’s message of equality of all humans, did not go well with the shrewd Brahmins.

Islam is the future of India. LET THE COMMON HINDUS NOT FALL INTO THE TRAP OF HINDUTVA PROPAGANDA AGAINST ISLAM AND PROPHET MUHAMMAD AND WITHOUT ANY FURTHER DELAY, ACCEPT THE PURE RELIGION OF ISLAM, AND FULFILL THIS DREAM OF BHAVISHYA PURAN.

Our Rebuttals to the above mistranslation and misinterpretation by Mulla Mushafiq:

1) Mulla had earlier claimed that certain section of hindus show intellectual dishonesty by not including the incident of Raja Bhoj getting interested to Mleccha religion and mulling to convert to it.( म्लेच्छधर्मे मतिश्चासीत्तस्य भूपस्य दारुणे) In the same way Mulla DOES NOT include the passage of turning to Ashes of Muhammad by the curse of Kaalidas. (भस्म भूत्वा स मायावी म्लेच्छदेवत्वमागत:ll भयभीतास्तु तच्छिष्या: देशं वाहीकमाययु:l गृहित्वा स्वगुरोर्भस्म मदहीनत्वमागतम्) He probably does not likes to mention that his prophet turned to ashes, became the lord of barbarians, His disciples got frightened and scared to the core, their fleeing to Vaahika land, reaching Madeena with their teacher’s ashes.

BY CONCEALING THESE MUCH TRANSLATIONS, MULLA IS SHOWING BIGGEST HYPOCRICY . I THINK HE MUST CHANGE HIS NAME TO MUNAFIQ SULTAN (منافق سلطان ) SOON.

2) The Arabic word madinah simply means “city.” Before the advent of Islam, the city was known as Yathrib but was personally renamed by Muhammad. The Koran also has thought us in chapter Al-Ah’zab verse 13, that the name of the city was known as Yathrib, Yathrib was a name of a village which a group of Arabs settled in it during the ancient time. Thus history has mentioned that when people of Prophet (Nuh) Noah came out from the ship after the flood, the area became too narrow for them to live, knowing that Abil tribe was also among them, whereas their leader (Yathrib bun Abil) the fourth grandson of Nuh (Noah) abled to build city and then settle in it. Al-Amaleek also has settled in the same city after they sent Abliya tribe away from the city. Indeed, the named Yathrib was well known during the past time. This is because the name Yathrib has been found in an old history writings and designs. In order to reason this claim, we say, the city was mentioned in Ptolemy geography with the name of Yathrib. It has also came in As-Sabi’ah sculptures that, the word (Medinata) which means Aramaic language as ( Himaa) means Hotness. Then it was summarized and then became Al-Madian. Naming the city as Yathrib was not accepted by the Prophet, simply because he insinuated the meaning of the word Yathrib and said the word means (blame and scolding), then he changed the name to Al-Medina. So after he honored the city with his immigration then it came known as Medinatu Rasul (means the city of the messenger)

( source- http://www.rafed.net/towns/english/madena.html)

From this we can see that Muhammad renamed thecity of Yathrib to Madina for his own personal reason. Moreover Quran 16:67 permits drinking of Alcohol.

Quran 16:67 says

“And of the fruits of the date-palm, and grapes, whence ye derive strong drink and (also) good nourishment. Lo! therein is indeed a portent for people who have sense.”

This is an apparent contradiction in Quran. First Mushafiq should organize muslims to abrogate verse 16:67 , then declare madina , a city free from intoxication.

1) Mulla is terming “devaropa” as the envoy of God. Which is far from truth. It has been shown that Muhammad was burnt to ashes and he attained “mlecchadevatvam” or the lord of barbarians. More than two times he is described as “Mayaamada visharada:” .And in the verses, that ‘devaroopa” tells that islam will be created by him.. All these point fingers that it is certainly Muhammad, the “ Mlecchadeva “ appeard at night before Raja Bhoj.

2) “आर्यधर्मो हि ते राजन सर्वधर्मोत्ताम : स्मृत: ईशाज्ञया करिष्यामि पैशाचं धर्मदारुणम्

Muhammad himself accepts that Aryan Religion-Noble Religion or Vedic Hinduism is the best among all others. But due to order of his Lord ( Bali), he will establish a TERRIBLE religion which will be meat eating.

All of us have seen that Tripurasura has returned by the orders of Demon Bali. And Since Muhammad is an Avatar of Tripurasur, we can conclude that the lord mentioned here is Bali. And ईशाज्ञया means by the order of his lord Bali Demon.

Islam has been established by Demon Muhammad as per the orders of Satan. Nowhere is shown that Aryan religion will be substituted by Islam. Its only mushafiq’s wishful thinking.

3) Pishitam acha: Pishacha :” That means a meat eating . Here mewat does not mention whether it’s a meat of Animal or humans. But definitely Paishachika term has its origins from Eating flesh of Humans. In puranas, so many demons are mentioned as Pishachas, who ate the flesh ( peshi) of humans.

http://bp3.blogger.com/_Q50_n_Q55wA/RsSvlRwMnYI/AAAAAAAAARM/NuCLeeBAsLE/s1600-h/Paisachya.jpg

Sanskrit-English dictionary describes paishacha as Demoniacal, infernal etc. Also Paishacha marriage is described as a marriage in which a lover kidnaps a woman without her consent , when she is sleeping, intoxicated , or in a deranged state.” सुप्ताम् मत्ताम् प्रमत्ताम् वा रहो यत्रोपगच्छति स पापिष्ठ : विवाहानाम् पैशाच : च अष्टमो अधम : ll “ Here paishacha is described as Demoniacal. So Paishacha word has meaning as demoniacal, meat eating, Human flesh eating etc.

In other words, something which causes loss of human lives can be termed “Paishacha “. Just read the news which religion causes the violent deaths of most human beings. Undoubtedly it is Islam. All around the world muslims have problem with all other communities, Once other communities are subjugated or eliminated, Muslims start killing themselves on the lines of Shia, Sunni, Sufi, Salafi, ahmedi etc..

Even a child can say Islam is the demoniac Paishacha dharma in present day world.

1) Mulla’s opinion about Vedas as permitting meat consumption is another topic, it will be debunked thoroughly in another article. I am doing this to shorten the length of present article.

2) The characteristic of muslims is described as “उच्चालापी” meaning talking very loudly, creating noises, etc. Surely their Azaan prayer is also a kind of environmental pollution. While church bells, or temple songs are peaceful, causing a soothing effect to mind. Mushafiq while claiming Holy Bible Isiah chapter 42 as dedicated to Muhammad, so as to cheat the Christians, had termed that Muhammad advised muslims not to talk loudly than him. But this “ucchaalaapi” term refutes the Isiah chapter 42 claims too. It is a direct contradiction.

3) Dooshaka is termed as polluter of the righteous Aryan religion. So muslims will pollute the righteous religion and establish devilsh acts as a norm. We must use the meaning, that majority use. “Dooshaka” is used as “polluting” in majority of cases.

4) About the caste system, Bhagavad gita clearly states “चातुर्वर्ण्यं माया सृष्टम् गुणकर्म विभागश: “ ie, the four varnas are created by me on the basis of Qualities and Action of the individual” A society needs Doctors, engineers, servants, businessmen, Administrative personnel, bureaucrats, Teachers, Religious servicemen, Military personnel etc. So classifying according to the innate qualities and actions of an individual is later degenerated to caste system. Anyway caste is not determined according to birth. Don’t the muslims have caste system among them? Please search Wikipedia about the caste system among south asian muslims.

5) Did islam eliminate the Slavery or caste?

Answer is an emphatic No. Numerous hadiths can be found when Muhammad is showing his disdain towards Black Africans. Is this the equality you preach?

I am reproducing an article on Wikiislam.net detailing the slavery and Arab supremacy practiced by Muhammad.

“Slavery is a part of Islam…(those who argue that slavery is abolished are) ignorant, not scholars. They are merely writers. Whoever says such things is an infidel.”

Saudi Sheikh Saleh Al-Fawzan, member of the Senior Council of Clerics, 2003

Islam Permits Slavery

These Hadiths show how Islam explicitly and implicitly permits slavery.

Narrated Al-Ma’rur: At Ar-Rabadha I met Abu Dhar who was wearing a cloak, and his slave, too, was wearing a similar one. I asked about the reason for it. He replied, “I abused a person by calling his mother with bad names.” The Prophet said to me, ‘O Abu Dhar! Did you abuse him by calling his mother with bad names You still have some characteristics of ignorance. Your slaves are your brothers and Allah has put them under your command. So whoever has a brother under his command should feed him of what he eats and dress him of what he wears. Do not ask them (slaves) to do things beyond their capacity (power) and if you do so, then help them.’ ”

Sahih Bukhari 1:2:29

Narrated Nafi: Ibn ‘Umar said, “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘If one manumits his share of a jointly possessed slave, and can afford the price of the other shares according to the adequate price of the slave, the slave will be completely manumitted; otherwise he will be partially manumitted.’ ” (Aiyub, a sub-narrator is not sure whether the saying ” … otherwise he will be partially manumitted” was said by Nafi’ or the Prophet.)

Sahih Bukhari 3:44:671

Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “There is no Zakat either on a horse or a slave belonging to a Muslim”

Sahih Bukhari 2:24:542

Narrated Abu Huraira : The Prophet said,”There is no Zakat either on a slave or on a horse belonging to a Muslim.

Sahih Bukhari 2:24:543

Narrated Ibn ‘Umar: Allah’s Apostle made it incumbent on all the slave or free Muslims, male or female, to pay one Sa’ of dates or barley as Zakat-ul-Fitr.

Sahih Bukhari 2:25:580

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet prohibited the earnings of slave girls (through prostitution).

Sahih Bukhari 3:36:483

Narrated Abu Musa Al-Ashari: The Prophet said, “He who has a slave-girl and teaches her good manners and improves her education and then manumits and marries her, will get a double reward; and any slave who observes Allah’s right and his master’s right will get a double reward.”

Sahih Bukhari 3:46:723

Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah’s Apostle said, “A pious slave gets a double reward.” Abu Huraira added: By Him in Whose Hands my soul is but for Jihad (i.e. holy battles), Hajj, and my duty to serve my mother, I would have loved to die as a slave.

Sahih Bukhari 3:46:724

Narrated ‘Abdullah: Allah’s Apostle said, “Everyone of you is a guardian and is responsible for his charges. The ruler who has authority over people, is a guardian and is responsible for them, a man is a guardian of his family and is responsible for them; a woman is a guardian of her husband’s house and children and is responsible for them; a slave (‘Abu) is a guardian of his master’s property and is responsible for it; so all of you are guardians and are responsible for your charges.”

Sahih Bukhari 3:46:730

Narrated Abdullah bin Zama: That he heard the Prophet delivering a sermon, and he mentioned the shecamel and the one who hamstrung it. Allah’s Apostle recited:– ‘When, the most wicked man among them went forth (to hamstrung the she-camel).’ (91.12.) Then he said, “A tough man whose equal was rare and who enjoyed the protection of his people, like Abi Zama went forth to (hamstrung) it.” The Prophet then mentioned about the women (in his sermon). “It is not wise for anyone of you to lash his wife like a slave, for he might sleep with her the same evening.” Then he advised them not to laugh when somebody breaks wind and said, “Why should anybody laugh at what he himself does?”

Sahih Bukhari 6:60:466

Narrated ‘Abdullah bin Zam’a: The Prophet said, “None of you should flog his wife as he flogs a slave and then have sexual intercourse with her in the last part of the day.”

Sahih Bukhari 7:62:132

A man from the Ansar called Basrah said: I married a virgin woman in her veil. When I entered upon her, I found her pregnant. (I mentioned this to the Prophet). The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: She will get the dower, for you made her vagina lawful for you. The child will be your slave. When she has begotten (a child), flog her (according to the version of al-Hasan). The version of Ibn AbusSari has: You people, flog her, or said: inflict hard punishment on him.

Abu Dawud 11:2126

It is rare nowadays to find slaves in the shar’i sense in which it is permissible to be intimate with them etc. That is because most of the Muslims have long since given up the obligation of jihad for the sake of Allaah, in addition to their position of weakness and humiliation before their kaafir enemies, so that many of the majority-Muslim nations have signed the protocol that expressly forbids slavery and strives to put an end to it, which was agreed upon in the United Nations in 1953.

Islam Q&A – Fatwa #26067

Islam Permits Raping Captives and Slaves

Abu Sa’id al-Khudri reported that at the Battle of Hunain Allah’s Messenger sent an army to Autas and encountered the enemy and fought with them. Having overcome them and taken them captives, the Companions of Allah’s Messenger seemed to refrain from having intercourse with captive women because of their husbands being polytheists. Then Allah, Most High, sent down regarding that:” And women already married, except those whom your right hands possess (Quran 4:. 24)” (i. e. they were lawful for them when their ‘Idda period came to an end).

Sahih Muslim 8:3432

Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported that a man came to Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) and said: I have a slave-girl who is our servant and she carries water for us and I have intercourse with her, but I do not want her to conceive. He said: Practise ‘azl, if you so like, but what is decreed for her will come to her. The person stayed back (for some time) and then came and said: The girl has become pregnant, whereupon he said: I told you what was decreed for her would come to her.

Sahih Muslim 8:3383

Muhammad Had No Animosity With Slavery

Mohammed regularly met with and commanded slaves without asking the slave’s master to free the slave even though it was within his power to do so.

Narrated Sahl: Allah’s Apostle sent someone to a woman telling her to “Order her slave, carpenter, to prepare a wooden pulpit for him to sit on.”

Sahih Bukhari 1:8:439

Narrated Jabir: A woman said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Shall I get something constructed for you to sit on as I have a slave who is a carpenter?” He replied, “Yes, if you like.” So she had that pulpit constructed.

Sahih Bukhari 1:8:440

Narrated Abu Hazim: Some men came to Sahl bin Sad to ask him about the pulpit. He replied, “Allah’s Apostle sent for a woman (Sahl named her) (this message): ‘Order your slave carpenter to make pieces of wood (i.e. a pulpit) for me so that I may sit on it while addressing the people.’ So, she ordered him to make it from the tamarisk of the forest. He brought it to her and she sent it to Allah’s Apostle . Allah’s Apostle ordered it to be placed in the mosque: so, it was put and he sat on it.

Sahih Bukhari 3:34:307

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Abu Taiba cupped Allah’s Apostle and so Allah’s Apostle ordered that a Sa of dates be paid to him and ordered his masters (for he was a slave) to reduce his tax.

Sahih Bukhari 3:34:412

Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet sent for a slave who had the profession of cupping, and he cupped him. The Prophet ordered that he be paid one or two Sas, or one or two Mudds of foodstuff, and appealed to his masters to reduce his taxes:

Sahih Bukhari 3:36:481

Narrated Abu Mas’ud: There was an Ansari man called Abu Shu’aib who had a slave butcher. Abu Shu’aib said to him, “Prepare a meal sufficient for five persons so that I might invite the Prophet besides other four persons.” Abu Shu’aib had seen the signs of hunger on the face of the Prophet and so he invited him. Another man who was not invited, followed the Prophet. The Prophet said to Abu Shu’aib, “This man has followed us. Do you allow him to share the meal?” Abu Shu’aib said, “Yes.”

Sahih Bukhari 3:43:636

A rock was put on a slave’s chest. When Abu Bakr complained, they said, ‘You are the one who corrupted him, so save him from his plight.’ I will do so,’ said Bakr. ‘I have a black slave, tougher and stronger than Bilal, who is a heathen. I will exchange him. The transaction was carried out.

Ishaq:144

Slaves Owned by Muhammad

The Slaves’ Names

“These are the names of Muhammad’s male slaves: Yakan Abu Sharh, Aflah, ‘Ubayd, Dhakwan, Tahman, Mirwan, Hunayn, Sanad, Fadala Yamamin, Anjasha al-Hadi, Mad’am, Karkara, Abu Rafi’, Thawban, Ab Kabsha, Salih, Rabah, Yara Nubyan, Fadila, Waqid, Mabur, Abu Waqid, Kasam, Abu ‘Ayb, Abu Muwayhiba, Zayd Ibn Haritha, and also a black slave called Mahran, who was re-named (by Muhammad) Safina (`ship’).”

Zad al-Ma’ad, pp. 114-116

Muhammad’s Maid Slaves “are Salma Um Rafi’, Maymuna daughter of Abu Asib, Maymuna daughter of Sa’d, Khadra, Radwa, Razina, Um Damira, Rayhana, Mary the Coptic, in addition to two other maid-slaves, one of them given to him as a present by his cousin, Zaynab, and the other one captured in a war.”

Zad al-Ma’ad, pp. 114-116

Muhammad Bought More Slaves Than he Sold

“Mohammed had many male and female slaves. He used to buy and sell them, but he purchased more slaves than he sold, especially after God empowered him by His message, as well as after his immigration from Mecca. He once sold one black slave for two. His name was Jacob al-Mudbir. His purchases of slaves were more than he sold. He was used to renting out and hiring many slaves, but he hired more slaves than he rented out.”

Zad al-Ma’ad, p. 160

Origins of Mahran’s (The “Ship”‘s) Nickname

“The apostle of God and his companions went on a trip. (When) their belongings became too heavy for them to carry, Muhammad told me, `Spread your garment.’ They filled it with their belongings, then they put it on me. The apostle of God told me, `Carry (it), for you are a ship.’ Even if I was carrying the load of six or seven donkeys while we were on a journey, anyone who felt weak would throw his clothes or his shield or his sword on me so I would carry that, a heavy load. The prophet told me, `You are a ship”‘

Hadiths Referring to Muhammad’s Slaves

…In those days it was rumored that Ghassan, (a tribe living in Sham) was getting prepared their horses to invade us. My companion went (to the Prophet on the day of his turn, went and returned to us at night and knocked at my door violently, asking whether I was sleeping. I was scared (by the hard knocking) and came out to him. He said that a great thing had happened. I asked him: What is it? Have Ghassan come? He replied that it was worse and more serious than that, and added that Allah’s Apostle had divorced all his wives. I said, Hafsa is a ruined loser! I expected that would happen some day.’ So I dressed myself and offered the Fajr prayer with the Prophet. Then the Prophet entered an upper room and stayed there alone. I went to Hafsa and found her weeping. I asked her, ‘Why are you weeping? Didn’t I warn you? Have Allah’s Apostle divorced you all?’ She replied, ‘I don’t know. He is there in the upper room.’ I then went out and came to the pulpit and found a group of people around it and some of them were weeping. Then I sat with them for some time, but could not endure the situation. So I went to the upper room wherethe Prophet was and requested to a black slave of his: “Will you get the permission of (Allah’s Apostle) for Umar (to enter)? The slave went in, talked to the Prophet about it and came out saying, ‘I mentioned you to him but he did not reply.’ So, I went and sat with the people who were sitting by the pulpit, but I could not bear the situation, so I went to the slave again and said: “Will you get he permission for Umar? He went in and brought the same reply as before. When I was leaving, behold, the slave called me saying, “Allah’s Apostle has granted you permission.” So, I entered upon the Prophet and saw him lying on a mat without wedding on it, and the mat had left its mark on the body of the Prophet, and he was leaning on a leather pillow stuffed with palm fires. I greeted him and while still standing, I said: “Have you divorced your wives?’ He raised his eyes to me and replied in the negative. And then while still standing, I said chatting: “Will you heed what I say, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! We, the people of Quraish used to have the upper hand over our women (wives), and when we came to the people whose women had the upper hand over them…”

Sahih Bukhari 3:43:648

Narrated Kurib: the freed slave of Ibn ‘Abbas, that Maimuna bint Al-Harith told him that she manumitted a slave-girl without taking the permission of the Prophet. On the day when it was her turn to be with the Prophet, she said, “Do you know, O Allah’s Apostle, that I have manumitted my slave-girl?” He said, “Have you really?” She replied in the affirmative. He said, “You would have got more reward if you had given her (i.e. the slave-girl) to one of your maternal uncles.”

Sahih Bukhari 3:47:765

Narrated ‘Ali: Fatima complained of what she suffered from the hand mill and from grinding, when she got the news that some slave girls of the booty had been brought to Allah’s Apostle. She went to him to ask for a maid-servant, but she could not find him, and told ‘Aisha of her need. When the Prophet came, Aisha informed him of that. The Prophet came to our house when we had gone to our beds. (On seeing the Prophet) we were going to get up, but he said, ‘Keep at your places,’ I felt the coolness of the Prophet’s feet on my chest. Then he said, “Shall I tell you a thing which is better than what you asked me for? When you go to your beds, say: ‘Allahu Akbar (i.e. Allah is Greater)’ for 34 times, and ‘Alhamdu Lillah (i.e. all the praises are for Allah)’ for 33 times, and Subhan Allah (i.e. Glorified be Allah) for 33 times. This is better for you than what you have requested.”

Sahih Bukhari 4:53:344

Narrated Abu Huraira: When we conquered Khaibar, we gained neither gold nor silver as booty, but we gained cows, camels, goods and gardens. Then we departed with Allah’s Apostle to the valley of Al-Qira, and at that time Allah’s Apostle had a slave called Mid’am who had been presented to him by one of Banu Ad-Dibbab. While the slave was dismounting the saddle of Allah’s Apostle an arrow the thrower of which was unknown, came and hit him. The people said, “Congratulations to him for the martyrdom.” Allah’s Apostle said, “No, by Him in Whose Hand my soul is, the sheet (of cloth) which he had taken (illegally) on the day of Khaibar from the booty before the distribution of the booty, has become a flame of Fire burning him.” On hearing that, a man brought one or two leather straps of shoes to the Prophet and said, “These are things I took (illegally).” On that Allah’s Apostle said, “This is a strap, or these are two straps of Fire.”

Sahih Bukhari 5:59:541

Narrated Aisha: That night I kept on weeping the whole night till the morning. My tears never stopped, nor did I sleep, and morning broke while I was still weeping, Allah’s Apostle called ‘Ali bin Abi Talib and Usama bin Zaid when the Divine Inspiration delayed, in order to consult them as to the idea of divorcing his wife. Usama bin Zaid told Allah’s Apostle of what he knew about the innocence of his wife and of his affection he kept for her. He said, “O Allah’s Apostle! She is your wife, and we do not know anything about her except good.” But ‘Ali bin Abi Talib said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Allah does not impose restrictions on you; and there are plenty of women other than her. If you however, ask (her) slave girl, she will tell you the truth.” ‘Aisha added: So Allah’s Apostle called for Barira and said, “O Barira! Did you ever see anything which might have aroused your suspicion? (as regards Aisha). Barira said, “By Allah Who has sent you with the truth, I have never seen anything regarding Aisha which I would blame her for except that she is a girl of immature age who sometimes sleeps and leaves the dough of her family unprotected so that the domestic goats come and eat it.”

Sahih Bukhari 6:60:274

Narrated Ibn Abbas: … I returned to my house, astonished (and distressed) that I did not know for what purpose I had gone out. Then I became sick (fever) and said to Allah’s Apostle “Send me to my father’s house.” So he sent a slave with me, and when I entered the house, I found Um Rum-an (my mother) downstairs while (my father) Abu Bakr was reciting something upstairs.

Sahih Bukhari 6:60:281

Then I put on my clothes and went to Allah’s Apostle’s residence, and behold, he was staying in an upper room of his to which he ascended by a ladder, and a black slave of Allah’s Apostle was (sitting) on the first step. I said to him, ‘Say (to the Prophet ) ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab is here.’…

Sahih Bukhari 6:60:435

I sat with them for a while but could not endure the situation, so I went to the upper room where the Prophet; was and said to a black slave of his, ‘Will you get the permission (of the Prophet ) for ‘Umar (to enter)?’ The slave went in, talked to the Prophet about it and then returned saying, ‘I have spoken to the Prophet and mentioned you but he kept quiet.’

Sahih Bukhari 7:62:119

Narrated Ali: Fatima went to the Prophet complaining about the bad effect of the stone hand-mill on her hand. She heard that the Prophet had received a few slave girls. But (when she came there) she did not find him, so she mentioned her problem to ‘Aisha. When the Prophet came, ‘Aisha informed him about that. ‘Ali added, “So the Prophet came to us when we had gone to bed. We wanted to get up (on his arrival) but he said, ‘Stay where you are.” Then he came and sat between me and her and I felt the coldness of his feet on my abdomen. He said, “Shall I direct you to something better than what you have requested? When you go to bed say ‘Subhan Allah’ thirty-three times, ‘Alhamdulillah’ thirty three times, and Allahu Akbar’ thirty four times, for that is better for you than a servant.”

Sahih Bukhari 7:64:274

Narrated Anas: I was a young boy when I once was walking with Allah’s Apostle . Allah’s Apostle entered the house of his slave tailor and the latter brought a dish filled with food covered with pieces of gourd. Allah’s Apostle started picking and eating the gourd. When I saw that, I started collecting and placing the gourd before him. Then the slave returned to his work. Anas added: I have kept on loving gourd since I saw Allah’s Apostle doing what he was doing.

Sahih Bukhari 7:65:346

Narrated Anas: Allah’s Apostle went to (the house of) his slave tailor, and he was offered (a dish of) gourd of which he started eating. I have loved to eat gourd since I saw Allah’s Apostle eating it.

Sahih Bukhari 7:65:344

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle was on a journey and he had a black slave called Anjasha, and he was driving the camels (very fast, and there were women riding on those camels). Allah’s Apostle said, “Waihaka (May Allah be merciful to you), O Anjasha! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (women)!”

Sahih Bukhari 8:73:182, See also:Sahih Bukhari 8:73:229

Narrated Anas: Once Um Sulaim was (with the women who were) in charge of the luggage on a journey, and Anjashah, the slave of the Prophet, was driving their camels (very fast). The Prophet said, “O Anjash! Drive slowly (the camels) with the glass vessels (i.e., ladies).”

Sahih Bukhari 8:73:221

Narrated ‘Umar: I came and behold, Allah’s Apostle was staying on a Mashroba (attic room) and a black slave of Allah’s Apostle was at the top if its stairs. I said to him, “(Tell the Prophet) that here is ‘Umar bin Al-Khattab (asking for permission to enter).” Then he admitted me.

Sahih Bukhari 9:91:368

Slaves Enslaved by Muhammad

Narrated ‘Abdul ‘Aziz: Anas said, ‘When Allah’s Apostle invaded Khaibar, we offered the Fajr prayer there yearly in the morning) when it was still dark. The Prophet rode and Abu Talha rode too and I was riding behind Abu Talha. The Prophet passed through the lane of Khaibar quickly and my knee was touching the thigh of the Prophet . He uncovered his thigh and I saw the whiteness of the thigh of the Prophet. When he entered the town, he said, ‘Allahu Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. Whenever we approach near a (hostile) nation (to fight) then evil will be the morning of those who have been warned.’ He repeated this thrice. The people came out for their jobs and some of them said, ‘Muhammad (has come).’ (Some of our companions added, “With his army.”) We conquered Khaibar, took the captives, and the booty was collected. Dihya came and said, ‘O Allah’s Prophet! Give me a slave girl from the captives.’ The Prophet said, ‘Go and take any slave girl.’ He took Safiya bint Huyai. A man came to the Prophet and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostles! You gave Safiya bint Huyai to Dihya and she is the chief mistress of the tribes of Quraiza and An-Nadir and she befits none but you.’ So the Prophet said, ‘Bring him along with her.’ So Dihya came with her and when the Prophet saw her, he said to Dihya, ‘Take any slave girl other than her from the captives.’ Anas added: The Prophet then manumitted her and married her…”

Sahih Bukhari 1:8:367

So Muhammad began seizing their herds and their property bit by bit. He conquered home by home. The Messenger took some people captive, including Safiyah and her two cousins. The Prophet chose Safiyah for himself.

Al-Tabari, Vol. 8, p. 116, See also: Ishaq:511

Narrated ‘Amr bin Taghlib: Allah’s Apostle gave (gifts) to some people to the exclusion of some others. The latter seemed to be displeased by that. The Prophet said, “I give to some people, lest they should deviate from True Faith or lose patience, while I refer other people to the goodness and contentment which Allah has put in their hearts, and ‘Amr bin Taghlib is amongst them.” ‘Amr bin Taghlib said, “The statement of Allah’s Apostle is dearer to me than red camels.”

Narrated Al-Hasan: ‘Amr bin Taghlib told us that Allah’s Apostle got some property or some war prisoners and he distributed them in the above way (i.e. giving to some people to the exclusion of others) .

Sahih Bukhari 4:53:373

Narrated Anas: The Prophet offered the Fajr Prayer near Khaibar when it was still dark and then said, “Allahu-Akbar! Khaibar is destroyed, for whenever we approach a (hostile) nation (to fight), then evil will be the morning for those who have been warned.” Then the inhabitants of Khaibar came out running on the roads. The Prophet had their warriors killed, their offspring and woman taken as captives. Safiya was amongst the captives, She first came in the shar

e of Dahya Alkali but later on she belonged to the Prophet . The Prophet made her manumission as her ‘Mahr’.

Sahih Bukhari 5:59:512

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle (p.b.u.h) offered the Fajr prayer when it was still dark, then he rode and said, ‘Allah Akbar! Khaibar is ruined. When we approach near to a nation, the most unfortunate is the morning of those who have been warned.” The people came out into the streets saying, “Muhammad and his army.” Allah’s Apostle vanquished them by force and their warriors were killed; the children and women were taken as captives. Safiya was taken by Dihya Al-Kalbi and later she belonged to Allah’s Apostle go who married her and her Mahr was her manumission.

Sahih Bukhari 2:14:68

Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: That while he was sitting with the Prophet a man from the Ansar came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! We get slave girls from the war captives and we love property; what do you think about coitus interruptus?” Allah’s Apostle said, “Do you do that? It is better for you not to do it, for there is no soul which Allah has ordained to come into existence but will be created.”

Sahih Bukhari 8:77:600

‘Imran b. Husain reported that a person who had no other property emancipated six slaves of his at the time of his death. Allah’s Messenger (may peace be upon him) called for them and divided them into three sections, cast lots amongst them, and set two free and kept four in slavery; and he (the Holy Prophet) spoke severely of him.

Sahih Muslim 15:4112

Narrated Abu Said Al-Khudri: The people of (Banu) Quraiza agreed to accept the verdict of Sad bin Mu’adh. So the Prophet sent for Sad, and the latter came (riding) a donkey and when he approached the Mosque, the Prophet said to the Ansar, “Get up for your chief or for the best among you.” Then the Prophet said (to Sad).” These (i.e. Banu Quraiza) have agreed to accept your verdict.”Sad said, “Kill their (men) warriors and take their offspring as captives, “On that the Prophet said, “You have judged according to Allah’s Judgment,” or said, “according to the King’s judgment.”

Sahih Bukhari 5:59:447

Slaves Traded by Muhammad

One Arab for Two Blacks

Jabir (Allah be pleased with him) reported: There came a slave and pledg- ed allegiance to Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) on migration; he (the Holy Prophet) did not know that he was a slave. Then there came his master and demanded him back, whereupon Allah’s Apostle (may peace be upon him) said: Sell him to me. And he bought him for two black slaves, and he did not afterwards take allegiance from anyone until he had asked him whether he was a slave (or a free man)

Sahih Muslim 10:3901

Slaves Sold by Muhammad

Narrated Jabir: A man manumitted a slave and he had no other property than that, so the Prophet cancelled the manumission (and sold the slave for him). No’aim bin Al-Nahham bought the slave from him.

Sahih Bukhari 3:41:598

Narrated Jabir bin Abdullah: A man decided that a slave of his would be manumitted after his death and later on he was in need of money, so the Prophet took the slave and said, “Who will buy this slave from me?” Nu’aim bin ‘Abdullah bought him for such and such price and the Prophet gave him the slave.

Sahih Bukhari 3:34:351

Narrated ‘Amr: Jabir said: An Ansari man made his slave a Mudabbar and he had no other property than him. When the Prophet heard of that, he said (to his companions), “Who wants to buy him (i.e., the slave) for me?” Nu’aim bin An-Nahham bought him for eight hundred Dirhams. I heard Jabir saying, “That was a coptic slave who died in the same year.”

Sahih Bukhari 8:79:707

Narrated Jabir: A man from the Ansar made his slave, a Mudabbar. And apart from that slave he did not have any other property.This news reached Allah’s Apostle and he said, “Who will buy that slave from me?” So Nu’aim bin An-Nahham bought him for 800 Dirham. Jabir added: It was a coptic (Egyptian) slave who died that year.

Sahih Bukhari 9:85:80

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: A man pledged that his slave would be manumitted after his death. The Prophet asked, “Who will buy the slave from me?” No’aim bin ‘Abdullah bought the slave and the Prophet took its price and gave it to the owner.

Sahih Bukhari 3:41:588

Narrated Jabir bin ‘Abdullah: A man amongst us declared that his slave would be freed after his death. The Prophet called for that slave and sold him. The slave died the same year.

Sahih Bukhari 3:46:711

Narrated Jabir: The Prophet came to know that one of his companions had given the promise of freeing his slave after his death, but as he had no other property than that slave, the Prophet sold that slave for 800 dirhams and sent the price to him.

Sahih Bukhari 9:89:296

Slave Transactions Initiated by Muhammad

Narrated Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani: A bedouin came and said, “O Allah’s Apostle! Judge between us according to Allah’s Laws.” His opponent got up and said, “He is right. Judge between us according to Allah’s Laws.” The bedouin said, “My son was a laborer working for this man, and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people told me that my son should be stoned to death; so, in lieu of that, I paid a ransom of one hundred sheep and a slave girl to save my son. Then I asked the learned scholars who said, “Your son has to be lashed one-hundred lashes and has to be exiled for one year.” The Prophet said, “No doubt I will judge between you according to Allah’s Laws. The slave-girl and the sheep are to go back to you, and your son will get a hundred lashes and one year exile.” He then addressed somebody, “O Unais! go to the wife of this (man) and stone her to death” So, Unais went and stoned her to death.

Sahih Bukhari 3:49:860

Narrated Abu Huraira and Zaid bin Khalid Al-Juhani: A bedouin came to Allah’s Apostle and said, “O Allah’s apostle! I ask you by Allah to judge My case according to Allah’s Laws.” His opponent, who was more learned than he, said, “Yes, judge between us according to Allah’s Laws, and allow me to speak.” Allah’s Apostle said, “Speak.” He (i .e. the bedouin or the other man) said, “My son was working as a laborer for this (man) and he committed illegal sexual intercourse with his wife. The people told me that it was obligatory that my son should be stoned to death, so in lieu of that I ransomed my son by paying one hundred sheep and a slave girl. Then I asked the religious scholars about it, and they informed me that my son must be lashed one hundred lashes, and be exiled for one year, and the wife of this (man) must be stoned to death.” Allah’s Apostle said, “By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, I will judge between you according to Allah’s Laws. The slave-girl and the sheep are to be returned to you, your son is to receive a hundred lashes and be exiled for one year. You, Unais, go to the wife of this (man) and if she confesses her guilt, stone her to death.” Unais went to that woman next morning and she confessed. Allah’s Apostle ordered that she be stoned to death.

Sahih Bukhari 3:50:885

Narrated Abu Huraira: Two women from the tribe of Hudhail (fought with each other) and one of them threw (a stone at) the other, causing her to have a miscarriage and Allah’s Apostle gave his verdict that the killer (of the fetus) should give a male or female slave (as a Diya).

Sahih Bukhari 9:83:41, See also: Sahih Bukhari 9:83:42, Sahih Bukhari 9:83:44, and Sahih Bukhari 9:83:45

Then the apostle sent for Sa’d bin Zayd al-Ansari brother of bin Abdul-Ashhal with some of the captive women of Banu Qurayza to Najd and he sold them for horses and weapons.

Ishaq:693

Miscellaneous

Bilal Bought in Exchange for a Black Non-Muslim Slave

Ishaq:144

Freeing of Slaves Discouraged by Muhammad

Sahih Bukhari 3:47:765

Reward for Freeing Muslim Slaves

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “Whoever frees a Muslim slave, Allah will save all the parts of his body from the (Hell) Fire as he has freed the body-parts of the slave.” Said bin Marjana said that he narrated that Hadith to ‘Ali bin Al-Husain and he freed his slave for whom ‘Abdullah bin Ja’far had offered him ten thousand Dirhams or one-thousand Dinars.

Sahih Bukhari 3:46:693

Narrated Abu Huraira: The Prophet said, “If somebody manumits a Muslim slave, Allah will save from the Fire every part of his body for freeing the corresponding parts of the slave’s body, even his private parts will be saved from the Fire) because of freeing the slave’s private parts.”

Sahih Bukhari 8:79:706

Conversion of Slaves to Islam

Narrated Abu Burda’s father: Allah’s Apostle said “Three persons will have a double reward: 1. A Person from the people of the scriptures who believed in his prophet (Jesus or Moses) and then believed in the Prophet Muhammad (i .e. has embraced Islam). 2. A slave who discharges his duties to Allah and his master. 3. A master of a woman-slave who teaches her good manners and educates her in the best possible way (the religion) and manumits her and then marries her.”

Sahih Bukhari 1:3:97

Marrying Slaves

Narrated Abu Haraira:
Allah’s Apostle said, “A lady slave should not be given in marriage until she is consulted, and a virgin should not be given in marriage until her permission is granted.” The people said, “How will she express her permission?” The Prophet said, “By keeping silent (when asked her consent).” Some people said, “If a man, by playing a trick, presents two false witnesses before the judge to testify that he has married a matron with her consent and the judge confirms his marriage, and the husband is sure that he has never married her (before), then such a marriage will be considered as a legal one and he may live with her as husband.”

Sahih Bukhari 9:86:100

“Ibn Umar reported the prophet as saying: “If a slave marries without the permission of his master, his marriage is null and void.”

Abu Dawud, Vol. 2, Ch. 597, No. 2074

Observing Hijab

Narrated Anas ibn Malik: The Prophet (peace be upon him) brought Fatimah a slave which he donated to her. Fatimah wore a garment which, when she covered her head, did not reach her feet, and when she covered her feet by it, that garment did not reach her head. When the Prophet (peace be upon him) saw her struggle, he said: There is no harm to you: Here is only your father and slave.

Abu Dawud 32:4094

Allah’s Opinion of Slaves

The common Muslim epithet ‘slave of Allah’ suggests that, according to Islam, slavery is in fact humanity’s natural state. Moreover Allah plainly takes a dim view of slaves, and scoffs at the idea of freeing them:

Allah sets forth the Parable (of two men: one) a slave under the dominion of another; He has no power of any sort; and (the other) a man on whom We have bestowed goodly favors from Ourselves, and he spends thereof (freely), privately and publicly: are the two equal? (By no means;) praise be to Allah. But most of them understand not.

Qur’an 16:75

And Allah hath favored some of you above others in provision. Now those who are more favored will by no means hand over their provision to those (slaves) whom their right hands possess, so that they may be equal with them in respect thereof. Is it then the grace of Allah that they deny?

Qur’an 16:71

Punishing Slaves

Narrated Ali ibn AbuTalib: A slave-girl belonging to the house of the Apostle of Allah (peace be upon him) committed fornication. He (the Prophet) said: Rush up, Ali, and inflict the prescribed punishment on her. I then hurried up, and saw that blood was flowing from her, and did not stop. So I came to him and he said: Have you finished inflicting (punishment on her)? I said: I went to her while her blood was flowing. He said: Leave her alone till her bleeding stops; then inflict the prescribed punishment on her. And inflict the prescribed punishment on those whom your right hands possess (i.e. slaves).

Abu Dawud 38:4458

Taking of Slaves from Prisoners of War

O Prophet, We have made lawful for thee thy wives whom thou hast given their wages and what thy right hand owns, spoils of war that God has given thee, and the daughters of thy uncles paternal and aunts paternal, thy uncles maternal and aunts maternal, who have emigrated with thee, and any woman believer, if she give herself to the Prophet and if the Prophet desire to take her in marriage, for thee exclusively, apart from the believers — We know what We have imposed upon them touching their wives and what their right hands own — that there may be no fault in thee; God is All-forgiving, All-compassionate.

Qur’an 33:50

ISLAM AND RACISM

Arab Superiority

Arabs are the most noble people in lineage, the most prominent, and the best in deeds. We were the first to respond to the call of the Prophet. We are Allah’s helpers and the viziers of His Messenger. We fight people until they believe in Allah. He who believes in Allah and His Messenger has protected his life and possessions from us. As for one who disbelieves, we will fight him forever in Allah’s Cause. Killing him is a small matter to us.

Al-Tabari, Vol. 9, p. 69

“A man married a maid-slave who bore him a child. Would that child be free or would he be an owned slave?” “Her child whom she bore from him would be the property of her master according to all the Imams (heads of the four Islamic schools of law) because the child follows the (status) of his mother in freedom or slavery. If the child is not of the race of Arabs, then he is definitely an owned slave according to the scholars, but the scholars disputed (his status) among themselves if he was from the Arabs – whether he must be enslaved or not because when A’isha (Muhammad’s wife) had a maid-slave who was an Arab, Muhammad said to A’isha, `Set this maid free because she is from the children of Ishmael.’”

Ibn Timiyya, Vol. 31, pp. 376-377

Ali Ibn Abi Talib, said: Verily the Prophet said: God divided the earth in two halves and placed (me) in the better of the two, then He divided the half in three parts, and I was in the best of them, then He chose the Arabs from among the people, then He chose the Quraysh from among the Arabs, then He chose the children of ‘Abd al-Muttalib from among the Banu Hashim, then he chose me from among the children of ‘Abd al-Muttalib, and from them he chose me.^[1]

Ibn Sa’d, Vol. 1, p. 12

Inter-Arab Racism

Superiority of One Tribe Over Another

Narrated Jabir bin Samura: I heard the Prophet saying, “There will be twelve Muslim rulers (who will rule all the Islamic world).” He then said a sentence which I did not hear. My father said, “All of them (those rulers) will be from Quraish.”

Sahih Bukhari 9:89:329

Racism Against Infidel Arab Tribes

The Arabs of the desert are the worst in Unbelief and hypocrisy, and most fitted to be in ignorance of the command which Allah hath sent down to His Messenger: But Allah is All-knowing, All-Wise.

Qur’an 9:97

Racism Against Black People

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah’s Apostle said, “You should listen to and obey, your ruler even if he was an Ethiopian (black) slave whose head looks like a raisin.”

Sahih Bukhari 9:89:256

Narrated Anas: The Prophet said, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if an Ethiopian whose head is like a raisin were made your chief.”

Sahih Bukhari 1:11:662

Narrated Anas bin Malik: The Prophet said to Abu-Dhar, “Listen and obey (your chief) even if he is an Ethiopian with a head like a raisin.”

Sahih Bukhari 1:11:664

Sahih Muslim 10:3901

‘Ubaidullah b. Abu Rafi’, the freed slave of the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him), said: When Haruria (the Khwarij) set out and as he was with ‘Ali b. Abu Talib (Allah be pleased with him) they said,” There is no command but that of Allah.” Upon this ‘Ali said: The statement is true but it is intentionally applied (to support) a wrong (cause). The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him described their characteristics and I found these characteristics in them. They state the truth with their tongue, but it does not go beyond this part of their bodies (and the narrator pointed towards his throat). The most hateful among the creation of Allah us one black man among them (Khwarij). One of his hand is like the teat of a goat or the nipple of the breast.When ‘Ali b. Abu Talib (Allah be pleased with him) killed them, he said: Search (for his dead body). They searched for him, but they did not find it (his dead body). Upon this he said: Go (and search for him). By Allah, neither I have spoken a lie nor has the lie been spoken to me. ‘Ali said this twice and thrice. They then found him (the dead body) in a rain. They brought (his dead) body till they placed it before him (Hadrat ‘Ali). ‘Ubaidullah said: And, I was present at (that place) when this happened and when ‘Ali said about them. A person narrated to me from Ibn Hanain that he said: I saw that black man.

Sahih Muslim 5:2334

Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would change so that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.

Al-Tabari, Vol. 2, p. 11, p. 11

Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem’s, the latter would enslave them.

Al-Tabari, Vol. 2, p. 21, p. 21

A man of B. al-‘Ajilan told me that he was told that Gabriel came to the apostle and said, ‘There comes to sit with you a black man with long flowing hair, ruddy cheeks, and inflamed eyes like two copper pots. His heart is more gross than a donkey’s; he carries your words to the hypocrites, so beware of him.’ This, so they say, was the description of Nabtal.^[2]

Ishaq:243

“I have heard the Apostle say: ‘Whoever wants to see Satan should look at Nabtal.’ He was a sturdy black man with long flowing hair, inflamed eyes, and dark ruddy cheeks. He used to come and talk with the Prophet and listen to him. He would carry what he had said to the hypocrites. Nabtal said, ‘Muhammad is all ears. If anyone tells him something he believes it.’ Allah sent down concerning him: ‘To those who annoy the Prophet and say that he is all ears, say, ‘Good ears for you.’ For those who annoy the Apostle there is a painful punishment.”^[2]

Ishaq:243

It is your folly to fight the Apostle, for Allah’s army is bound to disgrace you. We brought them to the pit. Hell was their meeting place. We collected them there, black slaves, men of no descent.

Ishaq:450

The black troops and slaves of the Meccans cried out and the Muslims replied, ‘Allah destroy your sight, you impious rascals.’

Ishaq:374

“Abu Darda reported that the Holy Prophet said: Allah created Adam when he created him (sic). Then He stroke (sic) his right shoulder and took out a white race as if they were seeds, and He stroke (sic) his left shoulder and took out a black race as if they were coals. Then He said to those who were in his right side: Towards paradise and I don’t care. He said to those who were on his left shoulder: Towards Hell and I don’t care. – Ahmad”

Mishkat, Vol. 3, p. 117

Ahmad ibn Abi Sulayman, the companion of Sahnun said, “Anyone who says that the Prophet was black should be killed.

Ibn Musa al-Yahsubi, Qadi ‘Iyad, p.375

“Ham [Africans] begat all those who are black and curly-haired, while Japheth [Turks] begat all those who are full-faced with small eyes, and Shem [Arabs] begat everyone who is handsome of face with beautiful hair. Noah prayed that the hair of Ham’s descendants would not grow beyond their ears, and that whenever his descendants met Shem’s, the latter would enslave them.”

Al-Tabari, Vol. 2, p. 21, p. 21

“Shem, the son of Noah was the father of the Arabs, the Persians, and the Greeks; Ham was the father of the Black Africans; and Japheth was the father of the Turks and of Gog and Magog who were cousins of the Turks. Noah prayed that the prophets and apostles would be descended from Shem and kings would be from Japheth. He prayed that the African’s color would changeso that their descendants would be slaves to the Arabs and Turks.”

Al-Tabari, Vol. 2, p. 11, p. 11

Narrated ‘Abdullah: The Prophet said, “I saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkempt hair going out of Medina and settling at Mahai’a, i.e., Al-Juhfa. I interpreted that as a symbol of epidemic of Medina being transferred to that place (Al-Juhfa).”

Sahih Bukhari 9:87:161

Narrated ‘Abdullah bin ‘Umar: concerning the dream of the Prophet in Medina: The Prophet said, “I saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkempt hair going out of Medina and settling at Mahai’a. I interpreted that as (a symbol of) the epidemic of Medina being transferred to Mahai’a, namely, Al-Juhfa.”

Sahih Bukhari 9:87:162

Narrated Salim’s father: The Prophet said, “I saw (in a dream) a black woman with unkempt hair going out of Medina and settling in Mahai’a. I interpreted that as (a symbol of) epidemic of Medina being transferred to Mahai’a, namely, Al-Juhfa.”

Sahih Bukhari 9:87:163

Negative Attitudes against Black Color

Abu Dharr reported: The Messenger of ‘Allah (may peace be upon him) said: When any one of you stands for prayer and there is a thing before him equal to the back of the saddle that covers him and in case there is not before him (a thing) equal to the back of the saddle, his prayer would be cut off by (passing of an) ass, woman, and black Dog. I said: O Abu Dharr, what feature is there in a black dog which distinguish it from the red dog and the yellow dog? He said: O, son of my brother, I asked the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) as you are asking me, and he said: The black dog is a devil.

Sahih Muslim 4:1032

And on the day of resurrection you shall see those who lied against Allah; their faces shall be blackened. Is there not in hell an abode for the proud?

Qur’an 39:60

The day will come when some faces will be brightened (lightened) (with joy), while other faces will be darkened (with misery). As for those whose faces are darkened, they will be asked, “Did you not disbelieve after believing? Therefore, suffer the retribution for your disbelief.” As for those whose faces are brightened (lightened), they will rejoice in GOD’s mercy; they abide therein forever.

Qur’an 3:106-107

Islamic Writers and Scholars on Black People

Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) was, among other things, an Islamic jurist, Islamic lawyer, Islamic scholar, Islamic theologian, and hafiz

“Therefore, the Negro nation are, as a rule, submissive to slavery, because [Negroes] have little [that is essentially] human and have attributes that are quite similar to those of dumb animals, as we have stated.”

Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah, 14th century

“beyond [known peoples of black West Africa] to the south there is no civilization in the proper sense. There are only humans who are closer to dumb animals than to rational beings. They live in thickets and caves, and eat herbs and unprepared grain. They frequently eat each other. They cannot be considered human beings.”

Ibn Khaldun, Muqaddimah

Ibn Sina or Avicenna (980-1037), was, among other things, a Hafiz, Islamic psychologist, Islamic scholar, and Islamic theologian

[Blacks are] people who are by their very nature slaves.

Quoted in “Blasphemy Before God: The Darkness of Racism In Muslim Culture” by Adam Misbah aI-Haqq

Ibn Qutaybah (828-889), was a renowned Islamic scholar from Kufa, Iraq

“[Blacks] are ugly and misshapen, because they live in a hot country.”

Ibn Qutaybah (828-889)

Nasīr al-Dīn al-Tūsī (1201-1274), was a Shia Muslim Scholar and Grand Ayatollah

“If (all types of men) are taken, from the first, and one placed after another, like the Negro from Zanzibar, in the Southern-most countries, the Negro does not differ from an animal in anything except the fact that his hands have been lifted from the earth -in no other peculiarity or property – except for what God wished. Many have seen that the ape is more capable of being trained than the Negro, and more intelligent.”^[3]

Nasir al-Din al-Tusi, Tasawwurat (Rawdat al-taslim):

[The Zanj (African) differ from animals only in that] their two hands are lifted above the ground,… Many have observed that the ape is more teachable and more intelligent than the Zanj.^[4]

Al-Muqaddasi (945/946-1000) was a medieval Muslim geographer

“Of the neighbors of the Bujja, Maqdisi had heard that “there is no marriage among them; the child does not know his father, and they eat people — but God knows best. As for the Zanj, they are people of black color, flat noses, kinky hair, and little understanding or intelligence.”^[3]

Al-Muqaddasi (fl. 966), Kitab al-Bad’ wah-tarikh, vol.4

Al-Masudi (896-956), was a Muslim historian and geographer, known as the “Herodotus of the Arabs.”^[5]

“Galen says that merriment dominates the black man because of his defective brain, whence also the weakness of his intelligence.”^[3]

Al-Masudi, Muruj al-dhahab

Ibn al-Faqih was a Muslim historian and geographer

“A man of discernment said: The people of Iraq … do not come out with something between blonde, buff and blanched coloring, such as the infants dropped from the wombs of the women of the Slavs and others of similar light complexion; nor are they overdone in the womb until they are burned, so that the child comes out something between black, murky, malodorous, stinking, and crinkly-haired, with uneven limbs, deficient minds, and depraved passions, such as the Zanj, the Somali, and other blacks who resemble them. The Iraqis are neither half-baked dough nor burned crust but between the two.”

Ibn al-Faqih al-Hamadani, Mukhtasar Kitab al-Buldan, 903 AD

Abu Rayhan al-Biruni (973-1048), was an Islamic scholar and polymath

“The Zanj are so uncivilized that they have no notion of a natural death. If a man dies a natural death, they think he was poisoned. Every death is suspicious with them, if a man has not been killed by a weapon.”

Abu Rayhan al-Biruni, India, 1030 AD

Hudud al-`Alam is a book dedicated to Abu l-Ḥārith Muḥammad b. Aḥmad, a ruler of the local Farighunid dynasty.

“Their [Zanj] nature is that of wild animals. They are extremely black.” “Among themselves [the Sudan] there are people who steal each other’s children and sell them to the merchants when the latter arrive.”

Hudud al-`Alam, 982 AD

“[inhabitants of sub-Saharan African countries] are people distant from the standards of humanity” “Their nature is that of wild animals…”

Hudud al-`alam, 982 AD

“As regards southern countries, all their inhabitants are black on account of the heat of their climate… Most of them go naked… In all their lands and provinces, gold is found…. They are people distant from the standards of humanity.”

Hudud al-`Alam, 982 AD

Al Jahiz (781–869), was a famous Muslim scholar

“Like the crow among mankind are the Zanj [African Blacks] for they are the worst of men and the most vicious of creatures in character and temperament.”

Jahiz, Kitab al-Hayawan, vol. 2

“We know that the Zanj (blacks) are the least intelligent and the least discerning of mankind, and the least capable of understanding the consequences of actions.”

Jahiz, Kitab al-Bukhala (The Book of Misers)

“They [the Shu`ubiyya] maintain that eloquence is prized by all people at all times – even the Zanj, despite their dimness, their boundless stupidity, their obtuseness, their crude perceptions and their evil dispositions, make long speeches.”

Jahiz, Al-Bayan wa`l-tabyin, vol. 3

Ibn Abi Zayd (922–996), was a Maliki scholar from Al-Qayrawan in Tunisia.

It is disliked to trade in the land of the enemy or the land of the blacks. The Prophet, peace be upon him, said, “Travel is a portion of punishment.”

Unsourced

11. One of the most effective ways of finding comfort and contentment is to remember Allaah frequently

Dhikr (remembrance of Allaah) has a wonderful effect in calming the soul and relieving stress and worry. Allaah says (interpretation of the meaning): “… Verily, in the remembrance of Allaah do hearts find rest.” [al-Ra’d 13:28]

The greatest phrase of dhikr that can relieve the distress of death is: “Laa ilaaha ill-Allaah (there is no god except Allaah).” This is what Talhah told ‘Umar, may Allaah be pleased with him: “I heard the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) say a word which no slave says at the time of death but Allaah will ease his distress and brighten his colour. It was only the fear that I might not be able to do it that prevented me from asking him about it before he died.” ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “I know what it is.” Talhah asked, “What is it?” ‘Umar (may Allaah be pleased with him) said: “Do you know any word greater that what he told his uncle to say? – ‘Laa ilaaha ill-Allaah’.” Talhah said, “That’s it, by Allaah, that’s it!”

Allamah Majlisi and Allamah Samawi write on the authority of Sayyid Razi Daudi that when fighting started at Karbala on the l0th of Muharram in the year 61 A.H. Jaun came to. Imam Husayn and desired his permission to fight. Imam Husayn said, “You have my permission. But O Jaun! You have stayed with me to live in peace and no wish to be killed!” At these words Jaun fell at the feet of Imam Husayn and said, “O my master, I am not one o those who flatter you during the period of peace and comfort, and leave you in times of adversity. O my master There is no doubt that my sweat gives a horrid smell, my lineage is not noble, and my colour is black, but with your blessing my sweat will become fragrant, my lineage will become noble and my colour will get white in Paradise. By Allah, I will not forsake you unless my blood mixes up with your blood”.

Muhammad bin Abi Talib Makki has written that when Jaun was martyred Imam Husayn came to his dead body, placed his head in his lap and prayed to Allah, “O Allah! Brighten the face of Jaun, make his sweat fragrant and give him a place with the virtuous ones in .Heaven, so that he may stay with Muhammad and his Progeny (Ahlul Bayt)”.

MUSHAFIQ, DO YOU THINK WHETHER ISLAM LIBERATED SLAVES OR DISESTABLISHED RACISM AFTER READING THE ABOVE HADITHS? IS THIS THE EQUALITY THAT YOU BOAST?

Now we can conclude that Islam should be dumped in the dustbin of history. Arya Dharma or Hinduism is the future of muslims all over the world . Without delay, Muslims should convert to Vedic Hinduism and lead peaceful life –without suicide bombings or beheadings.

MY CONCLUSION

[Bhavishya Puran, Prati sarg parv (3); Khand 1; Adhyaai 5, Shlokas 38-40]

या पवित्रा सप्तपुरी तासु हिंसा प्रवर्तते

दस्यव : शबरा: भिल्ला: मूर्खा: आर्ये स्थिता : नरा:

म्लेच्छदेशे बुद्धिमंतो नरा :वै म्लेच्छ धर्मिण:

म्लेच्छाधीना: गुणा : सर्वे अवगुणा: आर्य देशके

म्लेच्छ राज्यं भारते च तद्द्वीपेशु स्मृतं तथा

एवं ज्ञात्वा मुनि श्रेष्ट हरिं भज महामते

Actual meaning :

The seven sacred cities are infested with violence now. In the land of Aryas , the people include Dasyus,Shabaras, Bhillas and other fools. In the land of Mlecchas, the people are shrewd and cunning, following a foreign religion. All qualities have accumulated in foreigners, while vice has spread among inhabitants of Aryavarta. India will be ruled by Mlecchas including its islands. After understanding this ,( in order to prevent that ) O sage, worship God Hari.

Points to note:

1) Sapta puri : The seven sacred cities . They are Ayodhya, Mathura, Haridwar, Varanasi, Kancheepuram, Ujjain, and Dwaraka.

For further reading, please check this site . http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapta_Puri

2) “ प्रवर्तते’’ is the present tense. So the sentence “ या पवित्रा सप्तपुरी तासु हिंसा प्रवर्तते “ can be translated only as the seven sacred cities are infested with violence now. But Mulla Mushafiq adds the word “corruption” in it. Which is found nowhere. He also shows it in Future tense . Which is wrong. During muslim sultanate times of middle ages, the sacred cities of Hindus were attacked, ransacked,looted, women were sold as war booties to other muslims. Sexual slavery was widespread since the kaffir hindu women were captured in offensive wars. the temples were burnt and at the same places, mosques were erected.

3) Mulla wishfully thinks that in the Mleccha country people are wise and brave. This “brave” is his addition to the verse. There should have been Sanskrit term “dheera” to indicate bravery. But neither the word “Dheera” nor its synonyms are used. “म्लेच्छ देशे बुद्धिमंतो नरा: वै मलेच्छ धर्मिण:” can be translated as in the land of barbarians, people are wise and cunning and they follow a barbaric religion”. We have gone through the passage that Islam is a devilish religion created by devil incarnate Muhammad. So Mleccha dharma itself is satanic.

In other words Allah is Satan. In which other religion you can see the devotees turn violent immediately after Friday prayers in Mosques? It is because they worship Allah, Who is Satan.They turn violent and spew their vitriolic hatred towards non-muslims that too Just after prayer.

Wisdom can be used in a negative sense only. For Example Muslims in Iraq create car bombs and blow in crowded Shiite areas. Isn’t it Satanic? The sentence implies that Muslims are barbaric and use their wisdom for cunning and deception just as Mulla Mushafiq.

4) “म्लेच्छाधीना : गुणा: सर्वे अवगुणा : आर्यदेशके” Aryan noble land was corrupted by the thugs,( dasyus), shabara, bhilla , and foolish people. They were called fools because instead of uniting against foreign muslim armies , they were divided as small kingdoms and did not unite at the time of external attacks. Indeed it’s a foolishness from their part. Had they been united together, then Barbarian muslims or other European colonialists would have never got a chance to rule over them.

Here the Gunas mentioned are in a military sense. They were well organized armies who became victorious in the battles with Indian kingdoms.

5) म्लेच्छराज्यं भारते च तद्द्वीपेषऊ स्मृतं तथा

India will be ruled by barbarians along with its Islands.

6) एवं ज्ञात्वा मुनिश्रेष्ठ हरिं भज महामते

After knowing this, O sage, worship Lord Hari.

It is advised to worship Lord Hari in order to prevent Mleccha takeover of India . The underlying message is Indians who have the Noble Aryan Religion, the Vedic Hinduism, should not be weak and divided among themselves. Otherwise their honour will be compromised by blood thirsy Muslim armies and European Colonialists. By worshipping Lord Hari, India will attain its independence from Muslim Mughals and other muslim sultans. As well as Eurpean powers.

This final prophecy has come true in 1947 and 3 years later India became a republic, free from Mleccha dominion.

If Mushafiq thinks my interpretation is not true, he should come forward to present his case including historical and political context. I have successfully refuted most of his bogus claims through this blog. Anybody is welcome to comment and to argue about this article.

JAI HIND

2 thoughts on “Bhavishya Purana: Prediction of Muhammad : Debunking Islamic Polemicists Dr.Zakir Naik and Mushafiq Sultan”

submitter June 29, 2013 at 3:28 am

The question that most of us ask now, arose before during the time of Muhammad s.a.w; preaching the words of God onto Arabia. Was Muhammad mentioned? This was the question by inhabitants of Arabia towards Jews that embraced Islam. And if we refer to the claim by past Jewish converts, they had quote verses from Isaiah 42.

And if we look at the passages in Isaiah. God address His chosen servants with their names, and in the prophesied verse we see God mention clearly the prophet’s name. Some examples of God mentioning His servant by name.

(My Servant Isaiah, My Servant Eliakim, David My Servant, Jacob My Servant, My Servant Israel, and so in Isaiah 42:1 , God specifically mention My Servant Ahmad)

In Isaiah 42:1, it is deemed not a coincidence upon seeing the writing of both אתמך (Atmc) אחמד (Ahmd). And the word before אתמך (Atmc), is עבדי (Abedi~My Servant). For indeed, it is indicating Ahmad; Abedallah (Ahmad; Servant of God).

Not to mention אתמך (Atmc) happen to be a special term foretelling the coming of a righteous man and is used only ONCE throughout the entire Book. [could this be a copying error or an intended error?]

~~
The prophecy tells about Ahmad; ‘Servant of God’ whom will war to correct the wrongs and bringing judgement based on the law of God. He will liberate act of worshiping molten images and thus Arabia (wilderness desert, villages and cities) will glorify God since then. As can be seen today, inhabitants of Arabia are worshiping,praising God and singing words of God daily.

And we continue reading Isaiah 42:18 – 25; God remind the ‘blind and deaf’ about the wrath of God towards Children of Israel, who neglect the message brought by past Servant of God.

And not to repeat; the same mistake upon the coming of the new Servant of God

Reply ↓
1. mahometmoslem Post authorJune 29, 2013 at 8:57 am
  
  We do not recognise the fucking bible or the fucking Quran either…
  
  Reply ↓